From the Editor
After completing a course of psychotherapy, he felt better and began a part-time job. The employment gave him a sense of purpose. As a physician, I could both sympathize and empathize; for many, work is a meaningful part of life, after all.
But does psychotherapy necessarily result in employment? Does therapy pay for itself with economic benefits? Otto R. F. Smith (of NLA University College) and his co-authors attempt to answer these questions in an impressive new paper in Psychological Medicine. They report on an RCT involving more than 700 Norwegian participants who were randomized to a psychotherapy program (modeled after the UK’s IAPT service) or to treatment as usual. The authors used administrative databases to analyze employment, income, and the economic benefit. “The results support the societal economic benefit of investing in IAPT-like services.” We consider the paper and its implications.
In the second selection, Dr. Calina Ouliaris (of Macquarie University) and her co-authors look at the zero suicide approach. In a Commentary for The British Journal of Psychiatry, they argue that – despite being studied and implemented in several places – it lacks evidence. “The Zero Suicide Framework is an arguably vague framework with a scant evidence base, particularly for application in healthcare settings. Despite this, the concrete goal championed… that of ‘zero suicides’, is appealing and has been widely promulgated in mental health services, ahead of evidence for the same.”
Finally, in the third selection, Dr. Chris Y. Kim (of the University of Toronto) and his co-authors weigh the use of melatonin for children and adolescents. In The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, they are cautious, in part because of the lack of consistency of over-the-counter melatonin. “Melatonin used as a hypnotic agent for the treatment of insomnia is controversial.”
DG
Recent Comments