Tag: Park

Reading of the Week: In-person vs. Remote CBT – the New CMAJ Study; Also, Treatment & Opioids in the US, and AI & Med School Exams

July 25, 2024 /

From the Editor

In the early days of the pandemic, patients connected with us virtually from their kitchens and bedrooms – and, yes, their closets and washrooms. But as COVID-19 fades, we may wonder: what care should be delivered virtually and what should be done in person?

In the first selection, Sara Zandieh (of McMaster University) and her co-authors examine remote versus in-person CBT in a new CMAJ study. They conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with 54 randomized controlled trials and almost 5 500 participants, addressing both physical and mental problems. “Moderate-certainty evidence showed little to no difference in the effectiveness of in-person and therapist-guided remote CBT across a range of mental health and somatic disorders, suggesting potential for the use of therapist-guided remote CBT to facilitate greater access to evidence-based care.” We consider the paper and its implications.

In the second selection, Dr. Tae Woo Park (of the University of Pittsburgh) and his co-authors explore opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment. In their JAMA research letter, they compared medication and psychosocial treatments for OUD across the United States, surveying more than 17 000 facilities and analyzing the availability of evidenced-based interventions like buprenorphine and contingency management. “Substance use treatment facilities reported significant gaps in provision of effective treatments for OUD.”

And in the third selection from CNBC, Dr. Scott Gottlieb and Shani Benezra (both of the American Enterprise Institute) describe their experiment: they tasked several large language models with answering questions from the USMLE Step 3. The average resident score is 75%; four of five AI programs surpassed that benchmark. “[These models] may offer a level of precision and consistency that human providers, constrained by fatigue and error, might sometimes struggle to match, and open the way to a future where treatment portals can be powered by machines, rather than doctors.”

There will be no Reading next week.

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Stigmatizing Language & Patient Records – a New Qualitative Analysis; Also, Dr. Termini on Her Lie by Omission (JAMA)

July 29, 2021 /

From the Editor

After the hospitalization ends, a detailed summary. A quick note outlining the psychotherapy session. Written comments about the patient’s care as she or he begins work with another clinician. Medical records include all of the above.

But do they also include stigmatizing language?

In this week’s first selection, the authors consider such language in a new paper for JAMA Network Open. Jenny Park (of Oregon Health and Science University) and her co-authors look at 600 notes, and find the categories of positive and negative language using a qualitative analysis. They write: “Language has a powerful role in influencing subsequent clinician attitudes and behavior. Attention to this language could have a large influence on the promotion of respect and reduction of disparities for disadvantaged groups.”

 1024px-edwin_smith_papyrus_v2Ancient Egyptian medical records – stigmatizing language then too?

In our other selection, Dr. Katherine A. Termini (of Vanderbilt University) writes about self-disclosure. In a very personal essay, the psychiatrist discusses her own mental health problems – and her decision not to tell others in the medical profession. She then writes about changing her mind. “I encourage you to ask yourself: How have I contributed to this stigma and what can I do about it? If physicians step forward to tell their personal experiences with mental illness to an audience of colleagues willing to listen empathetically, we can make progress on the arduous task of destigmatizing mental health.”

DG

Continue reading