Tag: JAMA

Reading of the Week: Homelessness with Papers from Lancet and JAMA; Also, Kinsella on His Recovery

October 30, 2025 / / 0 Comments

From the Editor

The loss of her job. A couple of poorly timed moves, motivated by her need to help care for an ailing parent. Financial woes. These problems converged, and my patient found herself ill and homeless. What were the potential implications for mortality?

In a new paper published by The Lancet Public Health, Sandra Feodor Nilsson (of Copenhagen University) and her co-authors attempt to answer that question. Drawing on Danish data involving more than six million adults, they found that men and women live far fewer years when experiencing homelessness, 15.9 years and 15.3 years, respectively. Though past work has examined the topic, Nilsson et al. offer a more comprehensive look. “Life-years lost exceeded those observed in individuals with schizophrenia, alcohol use disorder (for males), and drug use disorder.” We consider the paper and its implications.

In the second selection, from JAMA, Drs. Kirk B. Fetters and Joshua A. Barocas (both of the University of Colorado) describe recent cuts to Housing First programs in the United States and weigh its impact. They note the evidence for this approach. “Because the health care system is already overburdened and the homelessness crisis is worsening, maintaining and expanding Housing First is not only compassionate but also imperative.”

And in the third selection, Sean Kinsella writes personally about homelessness and addiction. In an essay for the Irish Examiner, he discusses his deep problems – and his recovery. He advocates that we do more for those who are homeless. “I wasn’t seen. I wasn’t heard. I was a file. A risk to be managed.”

DG



Continue reading

Reading of the Week: VR-Assisted Therapy – the New Lancet Psych Paper; Also, Genetic Variations & Psychosis and Dr. Sundar on Patients With Answers

August 7, 2025 /

From the Editor

Even with medications, the voices tormented him. My patient explained that his every move was commented on.

In avatar therapy, patients engage audiovisual representations of their voices, with the goal of reducing their influence. In the first selection, a new paper from Lancet Psychiatry, Lisa Charlotte Smith (of the University of Copenhagen) and her co-authors look at a new form of avatar therapy, with an immersive 3D experience. In this RCT, participants had enhanced usual care or the therapy; the severity of auditory hallucinations was then measured at 12 weeks. “Challenge-VRT showed short-term efficacy in reducing the severity of auditory verbal hallucinations in patients with schizophrenia, and the findings support further development and evaluation of immersive virtual reality-based therapies in this population.” We consider the paper and its implications.

In the second selection, Dr. Mark Ainsley Colijn (of the University of Calgary) writes about psychosis and rare genetic variation. In a Canadian Journal of Psychiatry paper – part of the new Clinician’s Corner series – he offers suggestions for antipsychotic meds. “When providing care for individuals with psychosis occurring on the background of rare genetic variation, psychiatrists should take the time to educate themselves accordingly to ensure the safe and rational prescribing of antipsychotic medications in this population.”

And in the third selection, from JAMA, Dr. Kumara Raja Sundar (of Kaiser Permanente Washington) comments on patients who use ChatGPT. The author, a family doctor, notes that many physicians can be paternalistic – but he urges against that instinct. “If patients are arming themselves with information to be heard, our task as clinicians is to meet them with recognition, not resistance. In doing so, we preserve what has always made medicine human: the willingness to share meaning, uncertainty, and hope, together.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: When Does Grief Become a Disorder? The Lancet Review; Also, Time to End Daylight Saving Time? And Dr. Hickey on Her Anxiety

May 8, 2025 /

From the Editor

After the unexpected loss of his spouse, my patient sank deeply into grief. He was tearful during our sessions, explaining that a part of him had died, too. Weeks turned to months. Was this a normal response to a profound loss? Or something more problematic? DSM-5 seeks to clarify the issue by recognizing prolonged grief disorder – though the disorder is controversial and has attracted much criticism. When The New York Times covered the topic in 2022, Joanne Cacciatore (of Arizona State University) commented: “I completely, utterly disagree that grief is a mental illness.”

Clare Killikelly (of the University of Zurich) and her co-authors shed light on prolonged grief disorder with a new review, just published in The Lancet. They write about the disorder, the differences from grief, its treatment, and more, drawing on 142 citations. “Grief is a universal experience. However, for a minority of individuals, grief becomes a debilitating, devastating mental health disorder with serious implications on a personal and societal level.” We examine the review, highlight four take-aways, and reflect on the broader debate.

Spring forward, fall back. Twice a year, we adjust our clocks (and our brains) to and from daylight saving time. In the second selection, Dr. David Dongkyung Kim (of the University of Toronto) and his co-authors argue that daylight saving time should be eliminated. In their JAMA Commentary, they draw on the literature. “Daylight saving time transitions cause acute disruptions in human circadian rhythm, and the medical literature shows detrimental effects for public health.”

Finally, in the third selection, Dr. Joanne Hickey (of Memorial University) discusses anxiety and her expectations. In a personal CMAJ paper, the hematologist reflects on her work – and on her own journey, including her anxiety, the decision to take medications, and her need to come to terms with her perfectionism. “Anxiety has been my life companion, though I often didn’t recognize it. It masqueraded as that internalized need to control.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Are the Kids Alright? The New JAMA Paper on Mental Disorders & Children; Also, the Remarkable Life of Dr. Mary Seeman

May 1, 2025 /

From the Editor

Are children experiencing more mental disorders than before, or are we simply getting better at screening for them? Many have opinions and there is debate among psychiatrists and within our society.

In a new JAMA paper, Janet R. Cummings (of Emory University) and her co-authors provide new data shedding light on this issue. Drawing on US government databases covering 22 states and from 2010 to 2019, they looked at diagnoses and demographics among economically disadvantaged children. “This observational study found that the percentage of publicly insured children diagnosed with any mental health or neurodevelopmental disorder increased from 10.7% in 2010 to 16.5% in 2019.” We consider the paper and the accompanying Editorial – and wonder if this reflects better screening or more illness. 

In this week’s other selection, we look at the life and career of Dr. Mary Seeman, who died in 2024. In an obituary for The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Dr. Robert B. Zipursky (of the University of Toronto) and his co-authors note her many contributions to psychiatry. “Although Mary was 89 years old at the time of her death, her passion, humour, curiosity, and productivity had not abated. It endures now in the legacy of her scientific work, in her teaching and clinical care and in the many people she inspired to follow her example.”

DG


Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Physician Suicide – the New JAMA Psych Paper; Also, Homelessness & Substance (JAMA)

March 6, 2025 /

From the Editor 

It’s a demanding profession that can push us. Not surprisingly, there is some evidence that physicians may be at higher risk of completing suicide than the general population. But are we?

Hirsh Makhija (of the University of California, San Diego) and his co-authors attempt to answer this question in new JAMA Psychiatry study. Drawing on a US national database, they compared suicides among male and female physicians to the nonphysicians, over five years, finding that suicide rates for female physicians were 47% higher than for women in the general population. They also looked at mood, mental health, and other problems. “Comprehensive and multimodal suicide prevention strategies remain warranted for physicians, with proactive consideration for those experiencing mental health issues, job problems, legal issues, and diversion investigations.” We review the paper and its implications, and look at the accompanying Editorial.

In this week’s second selection, Ryan D. Assaf (of the University of California, San Francisco) and his co-authors report on homelessness and substance use. In a new paper for JAMA, they surveyed 3 200 people, finding that 37% reported using any illicit substance regularly (more than three times per week), most commonly crystal methamphetamine. “In a representative study of adults experiencing homelessness in California, there was a high proportion of current drug use, history of overdose, and unmet need for treatment.”

Note that there will be no Readings for the next two weeks.

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: ECT & Maintenance – the New JAMA Psych Paper; Also, Social Contagion & Psychiatry and Dr. Julie Trivedi on Resilience

December 12, 2024 /

From the Editor

He didn’t get better despite several medication trials. Exhausted and feeling suicidal, he chose ECT. The change was incredible. When he returned to the clinic after discharge – bright and energetic – a member of the outpatient team didn’t recognize him. 

But how can we keep people like my patient well and out of hospital? How strong is the evidence supporting maintenance ECT? Dr. Anders Jørgensen (of the University of Copenhagen) and his co-authors attempt to answer these questions in a new JAMA Psychiatry paper. Drawing on a Danish national database and spanning almost two decades of data, they analyzed outcomes for nearly 20 0000 patients who began ECT, including the risk of hospitalizations. “In this cohort study involving patients who had ECT, continuing ECT was associated with a decreased risk of rehospitalization after the acute ECT series and also associated with reduced treatment costs.” We consider the paper and its implications.

Denmark: a land of islands, picturesque cities, and maintenance ECT

In the second selection, Dr. Joel Paris (of McGill University) ponders the societal increase in psychiatric problems, arguing that social contagion may be a factor. In a new BJPsych Bulletin paper, he focuses on non-suicidal self-injurious behaviour. “When clinical symptoms or mental disorders rapidly increase in prevalence, social contagion should be considered as a likely mechanism shaping changes in the form of psychopathology.”

And in the third selection from JAMA, Dr. Julie B. Trivedi (of The University of Texas System) discusses her depression and its treatment. She notes her hospitalization – and her coming to terms with her illness, as a physician, a parent, and a person. “Today, I am focused on bringing light to topics that are stigmatized, talking about topics like mental health and burnout in health care workers that everyone wants to fix but are without an adequate solution, raising awareness of how to recognize mental health challenges among health care professionals, being an advocate for others, and reminding everyone that help is needed.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Brief CBT for Suicidal Inpatients – the New JAMA Psych Study; Also, Medicaid & Access, and Dr. Yager on Turning Off the Lights

September 19, 2024 /

From the Editor

After a suicide attempt, he was admitted through our ED. The hospitalization has been helpful: we changed his medications; the family is now more understanding of his problems; he has worked on safety planning with the team. However, could more be offered? It’s a relevant question – particularly for someone like me (I’ve worked on inpatient wards for most of my career).

In the first selection from JAMA Psychiatry, Gretchen J. Diefenbach (of Yale University) and her co-authors describe a randomized clinical trial involving 200 inpatients who received either the usual care or a focused CBT, tailored for short admissions. The one common factor: all participants had had a suicide attempt in the week prior to admission or current suicidal ideation along with a suicide attempt in the past two years. “Brief cognitive behavioral therapy–inpatient reduced 6-month post-discharge suicide reattempts and rate of readmissions when added to treatment as usual.” We discuss the paper and the clinical implications.

Inpatient care: preventing suicide with CBT?

How accessible is mental healthcare in the US? In the second selection, Dr. Diksha Brahmbhatt and William L. Schpero (both of Cornell University) look at Medicaid recipients and psychiatric appointments in a research letter for JAMA. Using a “secret shopper” approach, they contacted clinicians in four cities, trying to book a psychiatric appointment for those covered by the public program. “In the largest Medicaid managed care plans across 4 of the largest US cities, only 17.8% of clinicians listed as in-network for Medicaid were reachable, accepted Medicaid, and could provide a new patient appointment.”

And in the third selection, Dr. Joel Yager (of the University of Colorado), a retired psychiatrist, writes personally in a piece for JAMA. In his later years, Dr. Yager’s father helped his older friends and neighbours with the burden of aging, including visiting them in hospitals when they were ill. Now, he is doing what his father did. “After all, someone has to be around to put out the lights.”

This month, the Reading of the Week celebrates its 10th anniversary. A quick word of thanks for the ongoing interest. I’ll reflect more in the coming weeks.

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: In-person vs. Remote CBT – the New CMAJ Study; Also, Treatment & Opioids in the US, and AI & Med School Exams

July 25, 2024 /

From the Editor

In the early days of the pandemic, patients connected with us virtually from their kitchens and bedrooms – and, yes, their closets and washrooms. But as COVID-19 fades, we may wonder: what care should be delivered virtually and what should be done in person?

In the first selection, Sara Zandieh (of McMaster University) and her co-authors examine remote versus in-person CBT in a new CMAJ study. They conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with 54 randomized controlled trials and almost 5 500 participants, addressing both physical and mental problems. “Moderate-certainty evidence showed little to no difference in the effectiveness of in-person and therapist-guided remote CBT across a range of mental health and somatic disorders, suggesting potential for the use of therapist-guided remote CBT to facilitate greater access to evidence-based care.” We consider the paper and its implications.

In the second selection, Dr. Tae Woo Park (of the University of Pittsburgh) and his co-authors explore opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment. In their JAMA research letter, they compared medication and psychosocial treatments for OUD across the United States, surveying more than 17 000 facilities and analyzing the availability of evidenced-based interventions like buprenorphine and contingency management. “Substance use treatment facilities reported significant gaps in provision of effective treatments for OUD.”

And in the third selection from CNBC, Dr. Scott Gottlieb and Shani Benezra (both of the American Enterprise Institute) describe their experiment: they tasked several large language models with answering questions from the USMLE Step 3. The average resident score is 75%; four of five AI programs surpassed that benchmark. “[These models] may offer a level of precision and consistency that human providers, constrained by fatigue and error, might sometimes struggle to match, and open the way to a future where treatment portals can be powered by machines, rather than doctors.”

There will be no Reading next week.

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: tDCS for Depression – the New JAMA Psych Paper; Also, Psychiatrists & AI and Dr. Daniel Gorman on Charlatan Syndrome

April 11, 2024 /

From the Editor

In her autobiography, psychiatrist Linda Gask writes about her struggles with depression and the moment she realized that she was better: she started to hear the birds chirping again. For many of our patients, the songs of the birds remain elusive. Antidepressants work but some patients don’t respond, and others are cool to the idea of medication management. CBT is effective but difficult to access. What about Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) – an intervention that could be done at home?

Dr. Lucas Borrione (of the University of São Paulo) and his co-authors try to answer that question in a new JAMA Psychiatry paper. They report on a randomized clinical trial including 210 Brazilian adults with a major depressive episode who were offered tDCS and a digital intervention; the study featured two sham interventions. “The findings indicate that unsupervised home use tDCS should not be currently recommended in clinical practice.” We consider the paper and its clinical implications.

Would tDCS have helped?

Artificial intelligence is having a moment. Not surprisingly, many are seeing the possibilities for mental health care, from better therapy to reduced paperwork. In the second selection, from Psychiatry Research, Charlotte Blease (of Uppsala University) and her co-authors report on the findings of a survey of 138 psychiatrists with both qualitative and quantitative data. “The foremost interest was around the potential of these tools to assist psychiatrists with documentation.”

And in the third selection, Dr. Daniel Gorman (of the University of Toronto) writes about the struggles of taking a child to Disney World in JAMA. Any parent – or aunt or cousin or older sib – can relate. But Dr. Gorman notes the particular challenges that he faces: he’s a child psychiatrist. “Sometimes I fantasize about sharing with parents my doubts about parenting strategies, but the risks always seem too great – the risk of discrediting myself and my profession and the risk of robbing parents of agency and hope.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Health Care Workers & Suicide – the new JAMA Paper; Also, Esketamine vs Quetiapine for Treatment-Resistant Depression (NEJM)

October 12, 2023 /

From the Editor

Sure, we are biased – but ours is a different type of job. Working in health care can involve life and death situations and trying to help those who are at their most vulnerable. The stakes can be high. 

But how does such work affect the workers themselves? Dr. Mark Olfson (of Columbia University) and his co-authors try to answer that question in a new paper for JAMA. In it, they analyze suicides among six different types of health care workers, including physicians, by drawing on a US data that offers a nationally representative sample from 2008 to 2019, including 1.84 million people. “Relative to non-health care workers, registered nurses, health technicians, and health care support workers in the US were at increased risk of suicide.” We consider the paper and its implications.

And in the other selection, Dr. Andreas Reif (of the University Hospital Frankfurt) and his co-authors focus on treatment-resistant depression. In this new paper published in The New England Journal of Medicine, they report on the findings from a study where 676 patients were randomized to either esketamine nasal spray or an antipsychotic augmenting agent in addition to an antidepressant. “In patients with treatment-resistant depression, esketamine nasal spray plus an SSRI or SNRI was superior to extended-release quetiapine plus an SSRI or SNRI with respect to remission at week 8.” We also look at the accompanying editorial.

DG

Continue reading