Month: January 2025

Reading of the Week: Alcohol Use Disorder – The NEJM Review; Also, Private Equity & Opioid Treatment and Gee on Refusing Help

From the Editor

When she was admitted for liver cirrhosis – the last hospitalization in her too-short life – no one visited. In her community, the stigma was great. As she grew more and more ill, I asked if she wanted me to call her family to be at the bedside. She simply smiled and said that they were all busy.

Over the years, I have seen many patients like this woman; we all have. Alcohol misuse is common. What’s the best evidence for screening and treatment? Dr. Paul S. Haber (of the University of Sydney) tries to answer that question with a sparkling review, published in The New England Journal of Medicine. His paper is clearly written and draws from more than sixty references. “Alcohol use disorder is a relapsing and remitting medical and psychological disorder that influences physical health, mental health, and social functioning, and continuing care is recommended.” We consider the review and several key take-aways.

In the second selection, David T. Zhu (of Virginia Commonwealth University) and his co-authors analyze the ownership of opioid treatment programs in the United States, with a particular focus on private equity. The research letter, published in JAMA Psychiatry, drew on government data. “This study found that 29.1% of US opioid treatment programs were owned by private equity firms, exceeding private equity penetration in other sectors of health care (range, 2%-11%).”

And in the third selection, columnist Marcus Gee of The Globe and Mail writes about mental illness and patient rights. He discusses a woman in his neighbourhood who has delusions and refuses shelter in the cold weather, convinced that she will soon be offered keys to a new home. “Surely she deserves better. Surely we can do better.”

DG


Continue reading

Reading of the Week: More Therapy, More Inequity? The New JAMA Psych Study; Also, Dr. Reimer on Living with Depression and Generative AI & Biases

From the Editor

What has been the most significant innovation in mental healthcare delivery in recent years? It wasn’t a new medication or therapy, but the widespread adoption of the webcam in 2020. Over the course of a handful of pandemic weeks, psychiatrists and therapists switched to virtual sessions, making it easier for people to receive care, including psychotherapy, unbound by geography, and thus addressing inequity – or, at least, that was the hope. As noted recently in The New York Times: “In the 1990s, teletherapy was championed as a way to reach disadvantaged patients living in remote locations where there were few psychiatrists. A decade later, it was presented as a more accessible alternative to face-to-face sessions, one that could radically lower barriers to care.”

So, are more people receiving psychotherapy? And has this new era of virtual care resulted in better access for all? Dr. Mark Olfson (of Columbia University) and his co-authors attempt to answer these questions in a new paper for JAMA Psychiatry. Drawing on the data of more than 90 000 Americans, they analyzed trends in outpatient psychotherapy in the US, finding more care than ever before. That said, they note greater inequity: “psychotherapy use increased significantly faster among several socioeconomically advantaged groups and that inequalities were evident in teletherapy access.” We consider the study and its implications.

As doctors, we often shy away from discussing our health, especially our mental health – even with our own physicians. This is particularly concerning because doctors have a higher suicide rate than the general population, yet fears of vulnerability, judgment, and stigma keep many of us silent. In this episode of Quick Takes, I sit down with Dr. Joss Reimer, president of the Canadian Medical Association, who openly shares her own experiences with depression, as a doctor and as a patient. “We all need help sometimes.”

And in the third selection, Matthew Flathers (of Harvard University) et al. analyze AI depictions of psychiatric diagnoses in a new paper for BMJ Mental Health. They tested two AI image models with different diagnoses and commented on the results. “Generative AI models acquire biases at every stage of their development – from societal prejudice in online training data, to the optimisation metrics and safety guidelines each developer puts in place. These layered biases persist even when their precise origins remain elusive.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: The Best of 2024

From the Editor

Welcome 2025.

It’s our tradition that we begin the New Year by reviewing the best work of the past one. So, this week, we consider the best papers of 2024.

Let’s remember that this list is neither exhaustive nor definitive. The 10 selected papers are interesting and relevant to clinical practice, though many others could have been included.

These papers address topics ranging from artificial intelligence to antidepressant withdrawal. The common thread: their clinical relevance. 

Additionally, I name a person of the year.

DG

Continue reading