Month: May 2025

Reading of the Week: Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists & Mental Health – the New JAMA Psych Study; Also, Innovation and Lee on His Depression

From the Editor

These medications are widely discussed – and, yes, our patients ask about them. But how do glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists impact mental health and overall wellness? Should we hesitate before reaching for the prescription pad?

Aureliane C. S. Pierret (of King’s College London) and her co-authors attempt to answer these questions in a new paper just published in JAMA Psychiatry. In their systematic review and meta-analysis, they included more than 107 000 patients, comparing treatment with GLP1-RAs to placebo, looking at psychiatric, cognitive, and quality of life outcomes in those who are overweight, obese, or have diabetes. “Our results provide reassurance regarding the psychiatric safety profile of GLP1-RAs and suggest that GLP1-RA treatment is associated with improved mental well-being, in addition to the known physical health improvements.” We consider the paper and its implications.

When we hear innovations in mental healthcare, we tend to think of apps or wearables. In the second selection from Quick Takes, Daisy Singla (of the University of Toronto) discusses her recent study that expanded access to psychotherapy for perinatal women, reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety by drawing a page from work done in low-income countries. The key concept: training up laypeople to deliver therapy (task sharing). “It’s one of the largest psychotherapy trials in the world.”

And in the third selection, from The Globe and Mail, Joe Lee writes about his realization that he has depression and that it has affected his life for years. In a personal essay, he talks about his illness and the impact on his life. “Depression is weird like that. For some people, it sneaks in. For me, it’s always been there – like blood in my body.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Dating Advice for Patients? The New PLOS Mental Health Paper; Also, SSRIs at 50 and Lifestyle Psychiatry

From the Editor

My advocacy for him included speaking with his parents, calling his landlord, and completing his insurance-related paperwork. But I rarely asked him about his relationships, and I never offered advice on dating or finding a partner. During a tearful session, he spoke at length about his profound isolation. Should I have done more?

In a new study published in PLOS Mental Health, Angelica Emery-Rhowbotham (of University College London) and her co-authors explore the problem of relationships and our patients. They report both qualitative and quantitative data from 63 providers. “Staff were willing to help service users seek an intimate relationship but may need specific training or guidance to facilitate this confidently and safely.” We consider the paper and its implications.

In the second selection, the Editors of The Lancet reflect on the fiftieth anniversary of SSRIs. They note controversies over time, including the argument that clinicians are overly reliant on this type of depression treatment. “50 years on from landmark developments in drug treatment that were the cause of so much hope, we remain a long way from providing the level of care that so many people need, and this need continues to demand the attention of the scientific and medical communities.”

And in the third selection, from World Psychiatry, Joseph Firth (of The University of Manchester) and his co-authors describe the priorities and opportunities for lifestyle psychiatry. In a letter, they present the consensus of the LifePsych Society. “As lifestyle psychiatry is poised to become an integral component of global mental health care, the LifePsych Society aims to facilitate global collaborations, establish shared priorities, and enhance the capacity for meaningful research across diverse settings.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Lived Experience of Postpartum Depression & Psychosis – the New World Psych Paper; Also, Involuntary Treatment and Family Stress

From the Editor

“You are normal and then the next thing, you know, you’re crazy.”

So comments a woman about her postpartum depression. Typically, we describe this illness with a list of symptoms. But how do patients experience it? In a new World Psychiatry paper, Dr. Paolo Fusar-Poli (of King’s College London) and his co-authors attempt to answer this question with a “bottom-up” approach, looking at both postpartum depression and psychosis. “To the best of our knowledge, this is the first bottom-up review of the lived experience of postpartum depression and psychosis. Experts by experience co-designed, co-conducted and co-wrote the study, leveraging an established methodological template developed by our group to investigate the lived experience of psychosis [and] depression…” We look at the paper and its implications.

Should people with substance problems be forced into treatment? Across North America, some are proposing this idea, including governments in British Columbia and Alberta. In a new Canadian Journal of Psychiatry paper, Benedikt Fischer (of the University of Toronto) and his co-authors look at the issue and the evidence. “Involuntary treatment for severe SUD is a complex and contentious concept that requires careful in-depth consideration before its adoption.”

In the third selection, a paper written anonymously for The BMJ, the author describes the challenges for families of those with severe mental disorders. He notes his deep frustration with visits to the ward, often leaving him in tears. “Perhaps family support needs to become part of the culture on mental health wards, and we should recognise the need for help in communicating.”

DG


Continue reading

Reading of the Week: When Does Grief Become a Disorder? The Lancet Review; Also, Time to End Daylight Saving Time? And Dr. Hickey on Her Anxiety

From the Editor

After the unexpected loss of his spouse, my patient sank deeply into grief. He was tearful during our sessions, explaining that a part of him had died, too. Weeks turned to months. Was this a normal response to a profound loss? Or something more problematic? DSM-5 seeks to clarify the issue by recognizing prolonged grief disorder – though the disorder is controversial and has attracted much criticism. When The New York Times covered the topic in 2022, Joanne Cacciatore (of Arizona State University) commented: “I completely, utterly disagree that grief is a mental illness.”

Clare Killikelly (of the University of Zurich) and her co-authors shed light on prolonged grief disorder with a new review, just published in The Lancet. They write about the disorder, the differences from grief, its treatment, and more, drawing on 142 citations. “Grief is a universal experience. However, for a minority of individuals, grief becomes a debilitating, devastating mental health disorder with serious implications on a personal and societal level.” We examine the review, highlight four take-aways, and reflect on the broader debate.

Spring forward, fall back. Twice a year, we adjust our clocks (and our brains) to and from daylight saving time. In the second selection, Dr. David Dongkyung Kim (of the University of Toronto) and his co-authors argue that daylight saving time should be eliminated. In their JAMA Commentary, they draw on the literature. “Daylight saving time transitions cause acute disruptions in human circadian rhythm, and the medical literature shows detrimental effects for public health.”

Finally, in the third selection, Dr. Joanne Hickey (of Memorial University) discusses anxiety and her expectations. In a personal CMAJ paper, the hematologist reflects on her work – and on her own journey, including her anxiety, the decision to take medications, and her need to come to terms with her perfectionism. “Anxiety has been my life companion, though I often didn’t recognize it. It masqueraded as that internalized need to control.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Are the Kids Alright? The New JAMA Paper on Mental Disorders & Children; Also, the Remarkable Life of Dr. Mary Seeman

From the Editor

Are children experiencing more mental disorders than before, or are we simply getting better at screening for them? Many have opinions and there is debate among psychiatrists and within our society.

In a new JAMA paper, Janet R. Cummings (of Emory University) and her co-authors provide new data shedding light on this issue. Drawing on US government databases covering 22 states and from 2010 to 2019, they looked at diagnoses and demographics among economically disadvantaged children. “This observational study found that the percentage of publicly insured children diagnosed with any mental health or neurodevelopmental disorder increased from 10.7% in 2010 to 16.5% in 2019.” We consider the paper and the accompanying Editorial – and wonder if this reflects better screening or more illness. 

In this week’s other selection, we look at the life and career of Dr. Mary Seeman, who died in 2024. In an obituary for The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Dr. Robert B. Zipursky (of the University of Toronto) and his co-authors note her many contributions to psychiatry. “Although Mary was 89 years old at the time of her death, her passion, humour, curiosity, and productivity had not abated. It endures now in the legacy of her scientific work, in her teaching and clinical care and in the many people she inspired to follow her example.”

DG


Continue reading