Month: October 2024

Reading of the Week: Culturally-Adapted CBT for Postnatal Depression – the New Lancet Study; Also, ADHD in Adults (JAMA Psych) and the Latest in the News

October 31, 2024 /

From the Editor

She was offered CBT through our outpatient program. Though we encouraged her to come, she didn’t even attend one session. Was the problem partly with the rigidity of our program which wasn’t tailored to her cultural background or language? Can we do better? 

Dr. Nusrat Husain (of the University of Manchester) and his co-authors attempt to answer these questions in a new RCT published in The Lancet. In their study, British south Asian women with postnatal depression were randomized to a culturally-adapted form of CBT or treatment as usual. “Participants in the [intervention] group were estimated to be almost twice as likely to have recovered at 4 months than those in the control group.” We consider the paper, the accompanying Comment, and the implications for clinical care.

In the second selection, Drs. Carlos Blanco (of the National Institutes of Health) and Craig B. H. Surman (of Harvard University) write about ADHD for adults. In a new JAMA Psychiatry Viewpoint, they argue that more needs to be done, especially given the adverse outcomes of untreated ADHD. “A tension exists between undertreatment of adults with ADHD and overuse of addictive treatments for the condition.”

Finally, we explore the latest news with recent articles from The Washington Post, The Globe and Mail, and The New York Times. The topics: ChatGPT for psychotherapy, the generosity of Bruce McKean, and the street psychiatry in LA.

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: NMS – the New NEJM Review; Also, Primary Care & Mental Health and Lucy Foulkes on Mental Health Awareness

October 24, 2024 /

From the Editor

I started seeing him after his psychiatrist retired. For the most part, our interactions were unremarkable: quick visits when we would talk about his walks, and then I would offer a prescription. Imagine my surprise when I heard that he had been admitted to the ICU with fever, rigidity, and decreased consciousness.

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome, what my patient developed, is rare and potentially deadly. What’s the DSM description? The differential? What are the implications for future treatment? In the first selection, Drs. Eelco F. M. Wijdicks and Allan H. Ropper (both of the Mayo Clinic Hospital) provide a concise and lucid review for The New England Journal of Medicine. They summarize the literature and offer practical suggestions. “Neuroleptic malignant syndrome is a distinctive and alarming syndrome that occurs in some persons who have been exposed to dopamine-blocking agents, particularly (but not exclusively) antipsychotic drugs.” We discuss the review and its takeaways.

How much of primary care is focused on mental healthcare? In the second selection, Avshalom Caspi (of the University of Oslo) and his co-authors attempt to answer that question, drawing on Norwegian data. In a new study for Nature Mental Health, they analyzed 350 million contacts with primary care (yes, you read that correctly) over a 14-year period. “One out of every 8 or 9 encounters that a primary care physician is for a mental-health concern.”

In the third selection, Lucy Foulkes (of the University of Oxford) writes about mental health awareness efforts. While focusing on the UK, her comments are relevant here, with campaigns by Bell Canada and others. She raises several objections, including that these efforts aren’t matched by improved access to care. “We do not have clear evidence about the impact of mental health awareness efforts. It may be that these efforts are merely a waste of time or that they are actively harmful. Or it may be that despite the above concerns, there is still a net gain that makes the efforts worthwhile.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Care & Technology – Papers on Virtual Care and an App for Alcohol; Also, Dr. Reisman on ChatGPT & Bedside Manner

October 17, 2024 /

From the Editor

With COVID-19, mental health services were transformed in a matter of weeks when much care shifted to virtual. Today, we are all proficient in our webcams and familiar with terms like Zoom fatigue.

From a system perspective, we have unanswered questions: What’s the right amount of virtual care? When is it appropriate? In the first selection, Matthew Crocker (of the Canadian Institute for Health Information) and his co-authors focus on virtual versus in-person follow-up care after an ED visit in Ontario. Drawing on databases, they analyzed more than 28 000 such visits, wondering if the virtual option led to more adverse psychiatric outcomes. “These results support virtual care as a modality to increase access to follow-up after an acute care psychiatric encounter across a wide range of diagnoses.” We consider the paper and its implications.

Apps for mental health are increasingly popular; the mental health app market may be worth more than $24 billion by 2030, according to one estimate. In the second selection from Internet Interventions, John A. Cunningham (of the University of Toronto) and co-authors describe a new RCT involving participants who were concerned about their drinking. 761 were given either an app with several intervention modules or just educational materials. They were then followed for six months. “The results of this trial provide some supportive evidence that smartphone apps can reduce unhealthy alcohol consumption.”

And in the third selection, Dr. Jonathan Reisman, an ED physician, writes about AI. In a provocative essay for The New York Times, he argues that physicians often rely on scripts to seem compassionate – such as when we deliver bad news. AI, he reasons then, could do that well. “It doesn’t actually matter if doctors feel compassion or empathy toward patients; it only matters if they act like it. In much the same way, it doesn’t matter that A.I. has no idea what we, or it, are even talking about.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Antipsychotics – the New, the Old & the Patient Experience, with Papers from JAMA Psych, BJP and Schiz Bulletin

October 10, 2024 /

From the Editor

“FDA approves a novel drug for schizophrenia, a potential ‘game changer’”

– The Washington Post

“Will ‘Game Changer’ Antipsychotic Live Up to the Hype?”

– Medscape

Two weeks ago, for the first time in decades, the FDA approved an antipsychotic for schizophrenia with a novel mode of action. What does the data show for this medication, xanomeline-trospium chloride? Is it a “game changer” as some headlines suggest? 

In the first selection, Dr. Inder Kaul (of Karuna Therapeutics) and his co-authors report on a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial that was published in JAMA Psychiatry. 256 people with schizophrenia were given the antipsychotic or the placebo and followed for five weeks. “Xanomeline-trospium was efficacious and well tolerated in people with schizophrenia experiencing acute psychosis.” We consider the study and its implications.

In contrast to this week’s first selection, the second selection looks at an older antipsychotic: clozapine. Drawing on Canadian databases, Lloyd Balbuena (of the University of Saskatchewan) and his co-authors put the risks and benefits of this medication in a new light in a paper for The British Journal of Psychiatry. They analyzed data on admissions and adverse events, with almost 50 000 participants. “Clozapine was associated with lower relapse overall, but this was accompanied by higher adverse events for adults. For children/youth, clozapine was associated with lower relapse all throughout and had no difference in adverse events compared with other antipsychotics.”

And in the third selection, Susan Weiner writes about antipsychotics for Schizophrenia Bulletin. She discusses her first psychotic break, her long journey, and her ultimate recovery. In a personal essay, she also describes the connection she made with her psychiatrist and the medication that transformed her life. “The right medicine for the right person can produce sanity like a miracle drug, and all is once again bright.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Ten Great Papers; Also, Mindfulness’s Untapped Potential (JAMA Psych) and the FDA Approves an Antipsychotic (Nature)

October 3, 2024 /

From the Editor

It’s the 10th anniversary of the Reading of the Week. The program has grown and evolved over this past decade, now reaching psychiatrists and residents internationally, but the core idea – timely summaries of the latest in the literature coupled with commentary – hasn’t changed. To mark the anniversary, we look at some important papers that we have covered in the past ten years.

Last week: ten papers that I think about often (and helped change my clinical work).

This week: ten papers that I think about often (and helped change the way I view mental illness).

*      *      *

In the second selection, Jesus Montero-Marin (of the University of Oxford) and his co-authors consider mindfulness-based cognitive therapy in a new Viewpoint for JAMA Psychiatry. Noting the burden of depression, they see this therapy as being helpful, especially for those with “entrenched” depression. “By leveraging translational science, we can enhance access, engagement, and treatment outcomes for depression. This work uses MBCT as a foundational case study and delineates future research directions with the potential to profoundly impact service design and policy.”

And in the third selection, journalist Elie Dolgin reports on the new FDA-approved schizophrenia medication for Nature. He describes the novel mechanism of action and quotes Christoph Correll (of Hofstra University): “This will be a revolution of the treatment of psychosis, and I’m not saying this lightly. Now we will now be able to treat people who haven’t been helped with traditional antipsychotics.”

DG

Continue reading