Tag: Lamas

Reading of the Week: Brief CBT for Suicidal Vets – the JAMA Psych Study; Also, Docs & Generative AI, and Lamas on Organ Transplants & Mental Illness

From the Editor

As psychotherapies have become increasingly more practical and relevant in recent years, we may ask: could a focused therapy help individuals who are suicidal?

In a new JAMA Psychiatry paper, Craig J. Bryan (of the Ohio State University) and his co-authors attempt to answer that question, reporting on a randomized clinical trial involving military personnel and veterans. 108 participants were offered brief cognitive therapy (BCBT) or another psychotherapy, present-centred psychotherapy (PCT), building on past work that has shown the potential of BCBT for those who are suicidal. “This randomized clinical trial found that BCBT reduced suicide attempts among US military personnel and veterans reporting recent suicidal ideation and/or suicidal behaviors compared with an active comparator.” We consider the paper and its implications.

In the second selection, from JAMA Internal Medicine, Dr. Daniel J. Morgan (of the University of Maryland) and his co-authors, ask what physicians can do to prepare for generative AI. They offer several useful suggestions. “All physicians will need to understand the basics of GenAI to practice medicine in the next decade. Those without this understanding may find themselves burdened by archaic workflows or responsible for errors that GenAI could have prevented.”

And in the third selection, Dr. Daniela J. Lamas (of Harvard University), an intensivist, looks at transplantation and those who have mental disorders. In a New York Times essay, she notes an historic bias against such individuals. Still, she wonders about the difficulties of the area. Transplant is one of the most fraught decisions in medicine…”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: tDCS vs Sham for Depression – the New Lancet Paper; Also, US Ketamine Seizures and Dr. Lamas on Medical Practice & AI

From the Editor

He’s tried several medications, but still struggles with his depression. The story is too familiar. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an option, and increasingly the focus of research. With relatively few side effects and the possibility of doing the treatment at home, the advantages of tDCS are clear.

But how do patients taking antidepressants respond? In the first selection, from the pages of The Lancet, Dr. Gerrit Burkhardt (of the University of Munich) and his co-authors report the findings of an impressive study, with a comparison against sham treatment, across eight sites, and involving triple blinding. “Active tDCS was not superior to sham stimulation during a 6-week period. Our trial does not support the efficacy of tDCS as an additional treatment to SSRIs in adults with MDD.” We consider the paper, an accompanying Comment, and the implications.

In the second selection, Joseph J. Palamar (of New York University) and his colleagues analyze data on US ketamine seizures in a Research Letter for JAMA Psychiatry. They view seizures as a measure of recreational and nonmedical use, and conclude: “These data suggest increasing availability of illicit ketamine.”

And in this week’s third selection, Dr. Daniela J. Lamas (of Harvard University), an internist, writes about AI for The New York Times. In thinking about medical practice, she sees artificial intelligence doing more and more, and ultimately helping with diagnosis. She also sees trade-offs. Still, she concludes: “Beyond saving us time, the intelligence in A.I. – if used well – could make us better at our jobs.”

Note that there will be no Reading next week.

DG

Continue reading