Tag: primary care

Reading of the Week: NMS – the New NEJM Review; Also, Primary Care & Mental Health and Lucy Foulkes on Mental Health Awareness

October 24, 2024 /

From the Editor

I started seeing him after his psychiatrist retired. For the most part, our interactions were unremarkable: quick visits when we would talk about his walks, and then I would offer a prescription. Imagine my surprise when I heard that he had been admitted to the ICU with fever, rigidity, and decreased consciousness.

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome, what my patient developed, is rare and potentially deadly. What’s the DSM description? The differential? What are the implications for future treatment? In the first selection, Drs. Eelco F. M. Wijdicks and Allan H. Ropper (both of the Mayo Clinic Hospital) provide a concise and lucid review for The New England Journal of Medicine. They summarize the literature and offer practical suggestions. “Neuroleptic malignant syndrome is a distinctive and alarming syndrome that occurs in some persons who have been exposed to dopamine-blocking agents, particularly (but not exclusively) antipsychotic drugs.” We discuss the review and its takeaways.

How much of primary care is focused on mental healthcare? In the second selection, Avshalom Caspi (of the University of Oslo) and his co-authors attempt to answer that question, drawing on Norwegian data. In a new study for Nature Mental Health, they analyzed 350 million contacts with primary care (yes, you read that correctly) over a 14-year period. “One out of every 8 or 9 encounters that a primary care physician is for a mental-health concern.”

In the third selection, Lucy Foulkes (of the University of Oxford) writes about mental health awareness efforts. While focusing on the UK, her comments are relevant here, with campaigns by Bell Canada and others. She raises several objections, including that these efforts aren’t matched by improved access to care. “We do not have clear evidence about the impact of mental health awareness efforts. It may be that these efforts are merely a waste of time or that they are actively harmful. Or it may be that despite the above concerns, there is still a net gain that makes the efforts worthwhile.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Virtual Care & Schizophrenia – the New CJP Paper; Also, the Psychedelic Hype Bubble (JAMA Psych) and Aiello on Stigma (Walrus)

December 8, 2022 /

From the Editor 

At the start of the pandemic, the shift to virtual care was important and necessary, allowing us to reach our patients during the lockdowns. As we slowly move past COVID-19, there are big questions to ask. What’s lost in the virtual world? What’s right and what’s to be done?

In the first selection, Ellen Stephenson (of the University of Toronto) and her co-authors look at patients with schizophrenia. In a new paper just published in The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, they analyze different aspects of care, including prevention. They find: “There were substantial decreases in preventive care after the onset of the pandemic, although primary care access was largely maintained through virtual care.” We consider the paper and its clinical implications.

Virtual care, real-world gaps?

In the second selection, David B. Yaden (of Johns Hopkins University) and his co-authors weigh in on the enthusiasm and criticism of psychedelics. In this Viewpoint for JAMA Psychiatry, they argue that interest has reached a “hype bubble.” They make a call for action: “As scientists and clinicians, we have an ethical mandate to dispute claims not supported by available evidence. We encourage our colleagues to help deflate the psychedelic hype bubble in a measured way…”

And in the third selection, K. J. Aiello – who has lived experience – writes about mental illness and stigma in an essay for The Walrus. While noting some progress in the acceptance of mental disorders, the writer wonders how much has really changed. “Even as the stigma around mental illness has faded, it has become clear that this compassion and effort extend only so far, and that they are not available to everyone. Often those fault lines appear around class – and around the type of mental illness.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Suicide and Gender in Canada; Also, Access and Immigrants (CJP), and Chok on Variations on a Theme (CMAJ)

June 3, 2021 /

From the Editor

This week, we have three selections; all are from Canadian publications.

Suicide rates have been declining in this country. In the first selection, Sara Zulyniak (of the University of Calgary) and her co-authors look at suicide by age and gender, drawing on almost two decades’ worth of data. In their analysis, there is a surprising finding: “The suicide rates in females aged 10 to 19 and 20 to 29 were increasing between 2000 and 2018. In comparison, no male regression results indicated significantly increasing rates.” This research letter, just published in The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, is short and relevant.

chair

In the second selection, also from The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Joanna Marie B. Rivera (of Simon Fraser University) and her co-authors consider access to care. They focus on immigrants and nonimmigrants, noting differences in the way care is provided for those with mood disorders. “People with access to team-based primary care are more likely to report mental health consultations, and this is especially true for immigrants. Unfortunately, immigrants, and especially recent immigrants, are more likely to see a doctor in solo practice or use walk-in clinics as a usual place of care.”

Finally, in our third selection from CMAJ, Dr. Rozalyn Chok (of the University of Alberta), a pianist who is now a resident of paediatrics, describes a performance at a mental hospital. “I still hear exactly how it sounded on that tinny upright piano. I feel the uneven weighting of the keys, remember how difficult it was to achieve the voicing – the balance of melody and harmony – I wanted.” She reflects on the piece she played, and its impact on a patient.

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Depression, Pills & Adherence – the Sirey et al. Study on Improving Depression Treatment

October 19, 2017 /

From the Editor

The patient is depressed. The doctor has prescribed medications. But the patient doesn’t take them.

As a clinician, this scenario is too familiar with results that are too familiar – the patient doesn’t get better. What can we do to improve adherence?

In this week’s selection, we look at a new paper by Weil Cornell Medicine’s Jo Anne Sirey et al., considering this question. The authors do a randomized controlled trial with “a brief psychosocial intervention designed to improve adherence to pharmacotherapy for patients with depression.” So, is this intervention a game-changer? The authors find a five-fold increase in adherence during the first 6 weeks of care – but not much change in overall depressive symptoms.

153745515Pretty pill bottle: But how can we get patients to take the pills?

In this Reading, we review the paper.

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Gawande’s New Yorker Essay on Primary Care (and, Yes, Mental Health)

February 9, 2017 /

From the Editor

How is health care changing?

To answer that question, we look this week not to a medical journal, but to The New Yorker. We consider an essay not on new drugs or imaging, but on the quiet rise of… primary care.

Primary care and the future

Dr. Atul Gawande writes a long essay on the virtues of primary care. Considering how medicine has shifted from acute care to chronic illness, he describes the importance of primary care, drawing on his own training and thinking – and the cardiac issues of his son.

Though this essay doesn’t directly consider mental illness, it is very relevant.

DG Continue reading