From the Editor
Having only written four papers, the author wouldn’t seem particularly noteworthy. Yet the work is causing a buzz. Indeed, JAMA published an Editorial about the author, the papers, and the implications.
That author is ChatGPT, who isn’t human, of course – and that’s why it has made something of a splash. More than a million people tried this AI program in the week after its November launch, utilizing it to do everything from composing poetry to drafting essays for school assignments.
What to make of ChatGPT? What are the implications for psychiatry? And for our journals?
To the last question, some are already reacting; as noted above, last week, JAMA published an Editorial and also updated its Instructions to Authors with several changes, including: “Nonhuman artificial intelligence, language models, machine learning, or similar technologies do not qualify for authorship.”

This week, we feature an original essay by Dr. Scott Patten (of the University of Calgary) for the Reading of the Week. Dr. Patten, who serves as the Editor Emeritus of The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, considers ChatGPT and these three questions, drawing on his own use of the program.
(And we note that the field is evolving quickly. Since Dr. Patten’s first draft, Microsoft has announced a chatbot for the search engine Bing.)
DG

AI: The next great doctor – or just a pretty face?
Recent Comments