Tag: Zhu

Reading of the Week: Alcohol Use Disorder – The NEJM Review; Also, Private Equity & Opioid Treatment and Gee on Refusing Help

January 30, 2025 /

From the Editor

When she was admitted for liver cirrhosis – the last hospitalization in her too-short life – no one visited. In her community, the stigma was great. As she grew more and more ill, I asked if she wanted me to call her family to be at the bedside. She simply smiled and said that they were all busy.

Over the years, I have seen many patients like this woman; we all have. Alcohol misuse is common. What’s the best evidence for screening and treatment? Dr. Paul S. Haber (of the University of Sydney) tries to answer that question with a sparkling review, published in The New England Journal of Medicine. His paper is clearly written and draws from more than sixty references. “Alcohol use disorder is a relapsing and remitting medical and psychological disorder that influences physical health, mental health, and social functioning, and continuing care is recommended.” We consider the review and several key take-aways.

In the second selection, David T. Zhu (of Virginia Commonwealth University) and his co-authors analyze the ownership of opioid treatment programs in the United States, with a particular focus on private equity. The research letter, published in JAMA Psychiatry, drew on government data. “This study found that 29.1% of US opioid treatment programs were owned by private equity firms, exceeding private equity penetration in other sectors of health care (range, 2%-11%).”

And in the third selection, columnist Marcus Gee of The Globe and Mail writes about mental illness and patient rights. He discusses a woman in his neighbourhood who has delusions and refuses shelter in the cold weather, convinced that she will soon be offered keys to a new home. “Surely she deserves better. Surely we can do better.”

DG


Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Measurement-based Care – What’s the Evidence? Also, Goldbloom on the Joy of Jabbing

November 4, 2021 /

From the Editor

Well, he looks better.

So often our conversations about patients – in our emergency rooms, wards, and clinics – focus on soft evidence of improvement. No wonder: psychiatry lacks biomarkers. And so, while our colleagues in medicine talk about blood sugars and white blood cell counts, we often discuss other things, like how our patients look and sound.

The promise of measurement-based care: objective evidence of change (or lack thereof). The idea is having a moment, with more and more interest. But what does the literature say?

In the first selection, Maria Zhu (of the University of British Columbia) and her colleagues consider RCTs. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, they look at the efficacy of measurement-based care for depressive disorders. They conclude: “Although benefits for clinical response are unclear, MBC is effective in decreasing depression severity, promoting remission, and improving medication adherence in patients with depressive disorders treated with pharmacotherapy. The results are limited by the small number of included trials, high risk of bias, and significant study heterogeneity.” We discuss the big paper.

tape

The pandemic has changed much with day-to-day practice, including with the rapid virtualization of mental health care. Remember a time when you didn’t need to talk about “being on mute?” And some psychiatrists have been on the front lines of the vaccine effort. In the second selection, Dr. David Goldbloom (of the University of Toronto) writes about his experiences working in a vaccine clinic. His Toronto Lifeessay details the YouTube video he watched to remind himself of how to administer shots, his family ties to vaccinations, and his fondness for the work. “I will always be grateful to have experienced the joy of jabbing.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: COVID & Serious Mental Illness (JAMA Psych); also, Mental Health Care (Lancet Psych) and Hospital Care (Neurosci Bull)

April 9, 2020 /

From the Editor

In a heavy moment, a colleague of mine observed that spring is finally here, but none of us can enjoy it. This comment is one of many made over these past weeks about our new life. Our businesses are closed; our elderly are hiding; our colleagues are on the front lines and at risk. And, yes, the simple pleasure of enjoying a spring day – the warmth in the air, the song of the birds – has been lost, at least for now.

This week’s Reading has three selections, and each touches on the intersection between the pandemic and mental health care. Our new life means new challenges as we attempt to deliver mental health care services.

In the first selection, we consider a paper on COVID and serious mental illness. In a JAMA Psychiatry paper, Dr. Benjamin G. Druss (of Emory University) writes: “Disasters disproportionately affect poor and vulnerable populations, and patients with serious mental illness may be among the hardest hit.”

images

What is the role of mental health care during this pandemic? In the second selection, we consider a new Lancet Psychiatry editorial. The editors write: “Although the mental health field’s interest in trauma has greatly expanded in recent decades, our scientific understanding of trauma has lagged far behind, including our understanding of its definition and aetiology, and, importantly, of how to effectively intervene.”

Finally, in the third selection, we look at a letter by Dr. Yuncheng Zhu (of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine) and his co-authors. They discuss inpatient care and the risk and prevention of infection. “Panic is inevitable among patients and medical staff and timely mental health care for dealing with the novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed.”

DG

Continue reading