Tag: Artificial Intelligence

Reading of the Week: Suicide Barriers & Suicide Prevention – the New CJP Study; Also, the Future of Education and AI & Diagnoses

November 28, 2024 /

From the Editor

The idea is simple: if certain locations attract suicidal individuals, making it harder for suicides to occur at those places can help. After much debate, in 2003, the City of Toronto did exactly that, constructing a suicide barrier for the Bloor Viaduct. Suicides immediately declined. 

What has been the long-term effect? And have the means of suicide deaths simply shifted? In the first selection, Dr. Mark Sinyor (of the University of Toronto) and his co-authors attempt to answer these questions. In a new study published in The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, they drew on over two decades of data to analyze the impact of this suicide barrier. “Contrary to initial findings, these results indicate an enduring suicide prevention effect of the Bloor Viaduct suicide barrier.” We consider the study and its implications.

Pretty but lifesaving?

When it comes to medical education, much has changed over the years – including its name. What was once known as Continuing Medical Education (CME) is now referred to as Continuing Professional Development (CPD). But the changes go far beyond a simple rebranding. After all, the sheer volume of journal articles available today is staggering. How can you keep up? How can technology help? In the second selection, a new Quick Takes podcast, I speak with Dr. Sanjeev Sockalingam (of the University of Toronto) to explore the evolving world of CPD. “It took a pandemic to get us to realize that we could do so much online.”

Finally, in the third selection, from JAMA Network Open, Dr. Ethan Goh (of Stanford University) and his colleagues wonder if AI can assist physicians in making diagnoses. In an RCT, physicians were randomized to either conventional resources or those enhanced by access to AI (specifically, LLM). “In this trial, the availability of an LLM to physicians as a diagnostic aid did not significantly improve clinical reasoning compared with conventional resources.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Care & Technology – Papers on Virtual Care and an App for Alcohol; Also, Dr. Reisman on ChatGPT & Bedside Manner

October 17, 2024 /

From the Editor

With COVID-19, mental health services were transformed in a matter of weeks when much care shifted to virtual. Today, we are all proficient in our webcams and familiar with terms like Zoom fatigue.

From a system perspective, we have unanswered questions: What’s the right amount of virtual care? When is it appropriate? In the first selection, Matthew Crocker (of the Canadian Institute for Health Information) and his co-authors focus on virtual versus in-person follow-up care after an ED visit in Ontario. Drawing on databases, they analyzed more than 28 000 such visits, wondering if the virtual option led to more adverse psychiatric outcomes. “These results support virtual care as a modality to increase access to follow-up after an acute care psychiatric encounter across a wide range of diagnoses.” We consider the paper and its implications.

Apps for mental health are increasingly popular; the mental health app market may be worth more than $24 billion by 2030, according to one estimate. In the second selection from Internet Interventions, John A. Cunningham (of the University of Toronto) and co-authors describe a new RCT involving participants who were concerned about their drinking. 761 were given either an app with several intervention modules or just educational materials. They were then followed for six months. “The results of this trial provide some supportive evidence that smartphone apps can reduce unhealthy alcohol consumption.”

And in the third selection, Dr. Jonathan Reisman, an ED physician, writes about AI. In a provocative essay for The New York Times, he argues that physicians often rely on scripts to seem compassionate – such as when we deliver bad news. AI, he reasons then, could do that well. “It doesn’t actually matter if doctors feel compassion or empathy toward patients; it only matters if they act like it. In much the same way, it doesn’t matter that A.I. has no idea what we, or it, are even talking about.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: In-person vs. Remote CBT – the New CMAJ Study; Also, Treatment & Opioids in the US, and AI & Med School Exams

July 25, 2024 /

From the Editor

In the early days of the pandemic, patients connected with us virtually from their kitchens and bedrooms – and, yes, their closets and washrooms. But as COVID-19 fades, we may wonder: what care should be delivered virtually and what should be done in person?

In the first selection, Sara Zandieh (of McMaster University) and her co-authors examine remote versus in-person CBT in a new CMAJ study. They conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with 54 randomized controlled trials and almost 5 500 participants, addressing both physical and mental problems. “Moderate-certainty evidence showed little to no difference in the effectiveness of in-person and therapist-guided remote CBT across a range of mental health and somatic disorders, suggesting potential for the use of therapist-guided remote CBT to facilitate greater access to evidence-based care.” We consider the paper and its implications.

In the second selection, Dr. Tae Woo Park (of the University of Pittsburgh) and his co-authors explore opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment. In their JAMA research letter, they compared medication and psychosocial treatments for OUD across the United States, surveying more than 17 000 facilities and analyzing the availability of evidenced-based interventions like buprenorphine and contingency management. “Substance use treatment facilities reported significant gaps in provision of effective treatments for OUD.”

And in the third selection from CNBC, Dr. Scott Gottlieb and Shani Benezra (both of the American Enterprise Institute) describe their experiment: they tasked several large language models with answering questions from the USMLE Step 3. The average resident score is 75%; four of five AI programs surpassed that benchmark. “[These models] may offer a level of precision and consistency that human providers, constrained by fatigue and error, might sometimes struggle to match, and open the way to a future where treatment portals can be powered by machines, rather than doctors.”

There will be no Reading next week.

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Cancer & Suicide & Good News – the New Transl Psychiatry Study; Also, AI & Therapy Dropouts, and Bland on Her Father & His D-Day

June 13, 2024 /

From the Editor

He was so overwhelmed by the cancer diagnosis that he didn’t eat or sleep for days. “It was my worst nightmare.” My patient isn’t alone in that devastating experience, of course – the diagnosis and treatment of cancer is a major life event. Not surprisingly, the suicide rate is roughly double that of the general population in the United States. But with increasing psychosocial interventions, how has this changed over time?

In the first selection, Qiang Liu (of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences) and his co-authors attempt to answer that question in a new paper for Translational Psychiatry. Drawing on 40 years of data and a major US database, they analyzed the journeys of five million cancer patients, discovering good news. “We revealed a gradual increase in cancer-related suicide rates from 1975 to 1989, followed by a gradual decrease from 1989 to 2013, and a marked decrease from 2013 to 2017.” Indeed, between 2013 and 2017, the rate dropped by 27%. We consider the paper and its implications.

In the second selection, Sakiko Yasukawa (of the Sony Corporation) and her co-authors aimed to reduce dropouts from psychotherapy using AI. In a new paper for BMJ Mental Health, they describe an RCT involving 149 people. “The results suggest that the personalised messages sent by the chatbot helped participants control their pace in attending lessons and improve programme adherence without human guidance.”

Last week marked the anniversary of D-Day with ceremonies, including in Normandy. What was the toll on those who returned home? In the third selection, an essay published in The Globe and Mail, Normanne Bland describes her father and his time in Europe. She writes about him with mixed feelings, coloured by his mental health problems, including PTSD. “I had a complicated relationship with my father. I was proud of his service but I loathed his drinking.”

There will be no Reading next week.

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: tDCS for Depression – the New JAMA Psych Paper; Also, Psychiatrists & AI and Dr. Daniel Gorman on Charlatan Syndrome

April 11, 2024 /

From the Editor

In her autobiography, psychiatrist Linda Gask writes about her struggles with depression and the moment she realized that she was better: she started to hear the birds chirping again. For many of our patients, the songs of the birds remain elusive. Antidepressants work but some patients don’t respond, and others are cool to the idea of medication management. CBT is effective but difficult to access. What about Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) – an intervention that could be done at home?

Dr. Lucas Borrione (of the University of São Paulo) and his co-authors try to answer that question in a new JAMA Psychiatry paper. They report on a randomized clinical trial including 210 Brazilian adults with a major depressive episode who were offered tDCS and a digital intervention; the study featured two sham interventions. “The findings indicate that unsupervised home use tDCS should not be currently recommended in clinical practice.” We consider the paper and its clinical implications.

Would tDCS have helped?

Artificial intelligence is having a moment. Not surprisingly, many are seeing the possibilities for mental health care, from better therapy to reduced paperwork. In the second selection, from Psychiatry Research, Charlotte Blease (of Uppsala University) and her co-authors report on the findings of a survey of 138 psychiatrists with both qualitative and quantitative data. “The foremost interest was around the potential of these tools to assist psychiatrists with documentation.”

And in the third selection, Dr. Daniel Gorman (of the University of Toronto) writes about the struggles of taking a child to Disney World in JAMA. Any parent – or aunt or cousin or older sib – can relate. But Dr. Gorman notes the particular challenges that he faces: he’s a child psychiatrist. “Sometimes I fantasize about sharing with parents my doubts about parenting strategies, but the risks always seem too great – the risk of discrediting myself and my profession and the risk of robbing parents of agency and hope.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Antidepressants & Bipolar – the New NEJM Paper; Also, AI & Med Ed and Humphreys on Language

August 10, 2023 /

From the Editor

What’s the role of antidepressants in the treatment of bipolar disorder? That question is openly debated.

In a New England Journal of Medicine paper that was just published, Dr. Lakshmi N. Yatham (of the University of British Columbia) and his co-authors try to shed light on this issue. In their study, people with bipolar depression who were in remission were given an antidepressant or a placebo and followed for a year. The study involved 209 people from three countries. “[A]djunctive treatment with escitalopram or bupropion XL that continued for 52 weeks did not show a significant benefit as compared with treatment for 8 weeks in preventing relapse of any mood episode.” We consider the paper and its implications.

In the second selection, Drs. Avraham Cooper (of Ohio State University) and Adam Rodman (of Harvard University) consider AI and medical education in The New England Journal of Medicine. They talk about previous technological advancements in history, including the stethoscope. AI, in their view, will change practice and ethics – with clear implications for training and education. “If we don’t shape our own future, powerful technology companies will happily shape it for us.”

And in the third selection, Keith Humphreys (of Stanford University) writes about words and word choices to describe vulnerable populations in an essay for The Atlantic. He notes historic disputes, such as the use of the term patient. “[M]aking these judgments in a rigorous, fact-based way would prevent experts, policy makers, and the general public from being distracted by something easy – arguing about words – when we need to focus on doing something much harder: solving massive social problems.” 

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: tDCS vs Sham for Depression – the New Lancet Paper; Also, US Ketamine Seizures and Dr. Lamas on Medical Practice & AI

July 13, 2023 /

From the Editor

He’s tried several medications, but still struggles with his depression. The story is too familiar. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an option, and increasingly the focus of research. With relatively few side effects and the possibility of doing the treatment at home, the advantages of tDCS are clear.

But how do patients taking antidepressants respond? In the first selection, from the pages of The Lancet, Dr. Gerrit Burkhardt (of the University of Munich) and his co-authors report the findings of an impressive study, with a comparison against sham treatment, across eight sites, and involving triple blinding. “Active tDCS was not superior to sham stimulation during a 6-week period. Our trial does not support the efficacy of tDCS as an additional treatment to SSRIs in adults with MDD.” We consider the paper, an accompanying Comment, and the implications.

In the second selection, Joseph J. Palamar (of New York University) and his colleagues analyze data on US ketamine seizures in a Research Letter for JAMA Psychiatry. They view seizures as a measure of recreational and nonmedical use, and conclude: “These data suggest increasing availability of illicit ketamine.”

And in this week’s third selection, Dr. Daniela J. Lamas (of Harvard University), an internist, writes about AI for The New York Times. In thinking about medical practice, she sees artificial intelligence doing more and more, and ultimately helping with diagnosis. She also sees trade-offs. Still, she concludes: “Beyond saving us time, the intelligence in A.I. – if used well – could make us better at our jobs.”

Note that there will be no Reading next week.

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: A Century After Osler, Is He Relevant (NEJM)? Also, AI & Diagnosis (CMAJ) and Ketamine & Safety (JAD)

December 12, 2019 /

From the Editor

A century after his death, is Dr. Osler still relevant?

This week, there are three selections. First, we start with a look back with an essay on Dr. William Osler. We then look forward: with papers on AI and ketamine.

In the first selection, Drs. Charles S. Bryan (the University of South Carolina) and Scott H. Podolsky (Harvard University) write in The New England Journal of Medicine about Dr. Osler on the 100th anniversary of his death. Contemplating his life and views, they note that he “gave physicians what certain national historians gave their countries: warm feelings of togetherness, pride, and purpose.”

nlc012022-v6William Osler

In the second selection, we look at a CMAJ paper. Considering AI and health care, University of Strasbourg’s Dr. Thierry Pelaccia and his co-authors write about the reasoning of mind and machine. They see a bright future: “AI can assume its place as a routine tool in medical practice.”

Finally, for the third selection, we consider a new paper on ketamine and safety from the Journal of Affective Disorders. Drawing on several studies, NIMH’s Elia E. Acevedo-Diaz and her co-authors conclude: “The results indicate that a single intravenous subanesthetic-dose ketamine infusion was relatively safe for the treatment of [treatment-resistant depression].”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Involuntary Psychiatric Admissions – More Common, But Why? Also, the Failure of AI

May 24, 2018 /

From the Editor

Some patients are so ill that we take away their basic rights and freedoms, admitting them involuntarily to hospital. But how common is the practice?

In the first selection, we consider a new paper by Michael Lebenbaum et al. that looks at involuntary admissions from 2009 to 2013. They find the percentage is not only high (by international standards) but that it has soared in recent years – from 70.7% in 2009 to 77.1% in 2013.

Hand holding key (with key hole)

We consider a recent essay on AI in the second selection. Google has made international headlines with its program, Duplex, that can call and book appointments. In this piece, the authors note that AI has failed to live up to its potential. “Schedule hair salon appointments? The dream of artificial intelligence was supposed to be grander than this…”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: “Talking to Machines About Personal Mental Health Problems.” JAMA on Therapy & AI

October 5, 2017 /

From the Editor

Will people seek therapy with computers one day, getting care from programs built with Artificial Intelligence?

The authors of a new JAMA paper consider this in a short, clever piece, titled “Talking to Machines About Personal Mental Health Problems.”

In this two-part Reading of the Week series, we look at two papers, both published in JAMA. These Viewpoint pieces make interesting, provocative arguments.

This week, we look at conversational agents.

Next week, we ask: is CBT really the gold standard for psychotherapy?

Stanford University’s Adam S. Miner and his co-authors consider conversational agents – that is software programs that “use conversational artificial intelligence to interact with users through voice or text.” Could there be therapeutic value in such a program? What are the ethical challenges?

Robot and human hands almost touching - 3D render. A modern take on the famous Michelangelo painting in the Sistine Chapel; titled, "The Creation of Adam".

In this Reading, we review the paper, and consider the potential of conversational agents, with an eye on what’s currently available.

DG

Continue reading