Tag: Artificial Intelligence

Reading of the Week: AI Scribes in Primary Care – the New JAMA Psych Paper; Also, Antidepressant Prescribing and the Life & Death of Carol Sauer

February 5, 2026 / / 0 Comments

From the Editor

More physicians are turning to AI scribes to free up time. But what is the impact on clinical care?

In a new JAMA Psychiatry paper, Victor M. Castro (of Harvard University) and his co-authors attempt to answer that question by looking at scribes in primary care. In a cohort study drawing on more than 20 000 routine annual visits, they compared documentation and management of neuropsychiatric symptoms. “Incorporation of AI ambient scribes in primary care was associated with greater levels of neuropsychiatric symptom documentation but lesser likelihood of documented management of psychiatric symptoms.” We consider the paper and its implications.

In the second selection, a letter published in The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Dionzie Ong (of the University of British Columbia) and her co-authors consider antidepressant prescribing and evidence, focusing on citalopram and escitalopram. “Preferential prescribing of escitalopram and claims of superiority are not supported by science.”

Finally, in the third selection, Washington Post reporter Dana Hedgpeth writes about the life and death of Carol Sauer, who spent years experiencing homelessness. She had graduated from high school, attended university, and held jobs until 2000, when she became ill. A person who read her death notice on social media comments: “I cried thinking about her. This beautiful woman sitting for 20 years at a bus stop and nobody could make a difference… It’s a reminder of the power and responsibility we have to help those who are homeless and mentally ill.” 

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Yoga for Opioid Withdrawal? The New JAMA Psych Paper; Also, MAOIs & History, and AI-Associated Psychosis

January 29, 2026 / / 0 Comments

From the Editor

Yoga is increasingly recognized as having a role in the treatment of those with mood and anxiety problems. But what about substance misuse?

In the first selection, from JAMA Psychiatry, Suddala Goutham (of the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, India) and his co-authors attempt to answer that question in a new, early-stage randomized clinical trial. In the study, 59 men were randomized to yoga and buprenorphine or buprenorphine alone. “Those receiving yoga alongside standard buprenorphine treatment achieved withdrawal stabilization 4.4 times faster than controls (median, 5 vs 9 days) and showed significant improvements in heart rate variability, anxiety, sleep, and pain measures.” We consider the study and its implications.

In the second selection, from The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, Vincent Van den Eynde (of Radboud University) and his co-authors write about the MAOI class of antidepressants. In a commentary paper, they argue that these medications are underappreciated. “We thus emphasize the need for renewed attention to the classic MAOIs in clinical practice and research.”

And in the third selection, Dr. Joseph M. Pierre (of the University of California, San Francisco) and his co-authors write about AI-associated psychosis for Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience. They discuss what they suggest is the first journal-published case report, detailing the struggles of a practicing medical professional. “Although multiple pre-existing risk factors may be associated with psychosis proneness, the sycophancy of AI chatbots together with AI chatbot immersion and deification on the part of users may represent particular red flags for the emergence of AI-associated psychosis.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Antidepressants & Side Effects – the New Lancet Paper; Also, Medical Cannabis & Addiction, and AI Hallucinations

December 18, 2025 /

From the Editor

What are the physical side effects of antidepressants? In a new, impressive Lancet study, Toby Pillinger (of King’s College London) and his co-authors attempt to answer that old question with a new approach: the first systematic review and meta-analysis. They drew on 168 RCTs that measured physical health effects of antidepressants, including almost 59 000 participants and comparisons of 30 antidepressants. “We found strong evidence that antidepressants differ markedly in their physiological effects, particularly for cardiometabolic parameters.” We consider the paper and its implications.

How safe is cannabis for those taking it for medical purposes? Dr. Beth Han (of NIMH) and her colleagues report findings from a US survey in a new JAMA Psychiatry brief report, focusing on cannabis use disorder (CUD). They report that cannabis use wasn’t less addictive when used for medical reasons. “Clinicians should consider addiction risk before recommending medical cannabis and, if they do, should monitor for CUD emergence.”

The BMJ runs humorous articles in its Christmas issue. The journal doesn’t disappoint this year. Dr. Roberto A. Correa Soto (of the Universidad de los Andes) and his co-authors write about AI hallucinations and doctor BS (yes, you read that correctly). Frankly, the paper is worth reading for the profanity alone. “Both doctors and large language models (LLMs) are driven to produce misinformation – ‘bullshit’ and ‘hallucinations’ – owing to a shared pressure to provide answers, prioritising the appearance of competence over accuracy.”

There will be no Readings for the next three weeks. 

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Preventing PTSD – the New AJP Study; Also, AI Hallucinations and Dr. Gollapudi on Stethoscopes

November 27, 2025 /

From the Editor

Though years had passed since his peacekeeping service in Bosnia, my patient lucidly described the flashbacks and nightmares that still haunted him. It raises an important question: is it possible to prevent PTSD in the first place?

In a new, important American Journal of Psychiatry paper, Chelsea Dyan Gober Dykan (of Tel Aviv University) and her co-authors attempt to answer that question by drawing on past work showing the effectiveness of response-time-based attention bias modification (RT-based ABM), a cognitive training technique. They describe a three-arm randomized controlled trial involving more than 500 male combat-bound soldiers who, before combat exposure, received one of two cognitive training techniques (RT-based ABM and a variant focused on gaze) or a sham intervention. Participants then reported on PTSD symptoms after it. “Consistent with a previous randomized controlled trial, RT-based ABM reduced risk for PTSD relative to sham ABM when implemented prior to combat exposure.” We consider the paper and its implications.

How common are AI hallucinations? In the second selection, Jake Linardon (of Deakin University) and his co-authors look at hallucinations through the prism of psychiatry, asking ChatGPT to draft writing on several disorders. In their JMIR Mental Health study, hallucinations were frequent. “Citation fabrication and bibliographic errors remain common in GPT-4o outputs, with nearly two-thirds of citations being fabricated or inaccurate.”

Finally, in the third selection from Academic Psychiatry, Dr. Sheba Gollapudi (of the University of Texas) mulls the power of the stethoscope and its psychiatric equivalent. She describes how she developed her listening skills and her use of silence. “Because even though I will not necessarily use a stethoscope in my everyday practice, I know now that the stethoscope is within me.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Bipolar Disorder Drug Prescribing – Bad News? The New CJP Paper; Also, An AI Warning and Cannabis & Psychosis

September 11, 2025 /

From the Editor

There are more medication options than ever for the treatment of bipolar disorder. What are physicians prescribing? How often do we use lithium, arguably the best medication?

In the first selection, from The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Samreen Shafiq (of the University of Calgary) and her co-authors attempt to answer those questions in a new study. They drew on Alberta government data, including more than 130 000 individuals with bipolar disorder and more than nine million prescriptions. “Overall, we uncovered a concerning trend in the prescribing patterns for bipolar disorder treatment, with antidepressants and second-generation antipsychotics being prescribed frequently and a decline in prescribing of lithium and other mood stabilizers.” We consider the paper and its implications.

What would John Cade think?

In the second selection, Dr. Allen Frances (of Duke University) writes about AI chatbots and psychotherapy in The British Journal of Psychiatry. He notes their “remarkable fluency” and argues that there are clear benefits to AI psychotherapy. He also comments on dangers, and he doesn’t mince his words. “Artificial intelligence is an existential threat to our profession. Already a very tough competitor, it will become ever more imposing with increasing technical power, rapidly expanding clinical experience and widespread public familiarity.”

And in the third section, Sophie Li (of the University of Ottawa) and her co-authors consider psychosis and cannabis in a concise CMAJ paper. They make several points, including: “The tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content of cannabis has roughly quintupled in the past 2 decades, from around 4% in the 2000s to more than 20% in most legal dried cannabis in Canada by 2023.”

There will be no Reading next week.

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Suicide Barriers & Suicide Prevention – the New CJP Study; Also, the Future of Education and AI & Diagnoses

November 28, 2024 /

From the Editor

The idea is simple: if certain locations attract suicidal individuals, making it harder for suicides to occur at those places can help. After much debate, in 2003, the City of Toronto did exactly that, constructing a suicide barrier for the Bloor Viaduct. Suicides immediately declined. 

What has been the long-term effect? And have the means of suicide deaths simply shifted? In the first selection, Dr. Mark Sinyor (of the University of Toronto) and his co-authors attempt to answer these questions. In a new study published in The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, they drew on over two decades of data to analyze the impact of this suicide barrier. “Contrary to initial findings, these results indicate an enduring suicide prevention effect of the Bloor Viaduct suicide barrier.” We consider the study and its implications.

Pretty but lifesaving?

When it comes to medical education, much has changed over the years – including its name. What was once known as Continuing Medical Education (CME) is now referred to as Continuing Professional Development (CPD). But the changes go far beyond a simple rebranding. After all, the sheer volume of journal articles available today is staggering. How can you keep up? How can technology help? In the second selection, a new Quick Takes podcast, I speak with Dr. Sanjeev Sockalingam (of the University of Toronto) to explore the evolving world of CPD. “It took a pandemic to get us to realize that we could do so much online.”

Finally, in the third selection, from JAMA Network Open, Dr. Ethan Goh (of Stanford University) and his colleagues wonder if AI can assist physicians in making diagnoses. In an RCT, physicians were randomized to either conventional resources or those enhanced by access to AI (specifically, LLM). “In this trial, the availability of an LLM to physicians as a diagnostic aid did not significantly improve clinical reasoning compared with conventional resources.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Care & Technology – Papers on Virtual Care and an App for Alcohol; Also, Dr. Reisman on ChatGPT & Bedside Manner

October 17, 2024 /

From the Editor

With COVID-19, mental health services were transformed in a matter of weeks when much care shifted to virtual. Today, we are all proficient in our webcams and familiar with terms like Zoom fatigue.

From a system perspective, we have unanswered questions: What’s the right amount of virtual care? When is it appropriate? In the first selection, Matthew Crocker (of the Canadian Institute for Health Information) and his co-authors focus on virtual versus in-person follow-up care after an ED visit in Ontario. Drawing on databases, they analyzed more than 28 000 such visits, wondering if the virtual option led to more adverse psychiatric outcomes. “These results support virtual care as a modality to increase access to follow-up after an acute care psychiatric encounter across a wide range of diagnoses.” We consider the paper and its implications.

Apps for mental health are increasingly popular; the mental health app market may be worth more than $24 billion by 2030, according to one estimate. In the second selection from Internet Interventions, John A. Cunningham (of the University of Toronto) and co-authors describe a new RCT involving participants who were concerned about their drinking. 761 were given either an app with several intervention modules or just educational materials. They were then followed for six months. “The results of this trial provide some supportive evidence that smartphone apps can reduce unhealthy alcohol consumption.”

And in the third selection, Dr. Jonathan Reisman, an ED physician, writes about AI. In a provocative essay for The New York Times, he argues that physicians often rely on scripts to seem compassionate – such as when we deliver bad news. AI, he reasons then, could do that well. “It doesn’t actually matter if doctors feel compassion or empathy toward patients; it only matters if they act like it. In much the same way, it doesn’t matter that A.I. has no idea what we, or it, are even talking about.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: In-person vs. Remote CBT – the New CMAJ Study; Also, Treatment & Opioids in the US, and AI & Med School Exams

July 25, 2024 /

From the Editor

In the early days of the pandemic, patients connected with us virtually from their kitchens and bedrooms – and, yes, their closets and washrooms. But as COVID-19 fades, we may wonder: what care should be delivered virtually and what should be done in person?

In the first selection, Sara Zandieh (of McMaster University) and her co-authors examine remote versus in-person CBT in a new CMAJ study. They conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with 54 randomized controlled trials and almost 5 500 participants, addressing both physical and mental problems. “Moderate-certainty evidence showed little to no difference in the effectiveness of in-person and therapist-guided remote CBT across a range of mental health and somatic disorders, suggesting potential for the use of therapist-guided remote CBT to facilitate greater access to evidence-based care.” We consider the paper and its implications.

In the second selection, Dr. Tae Woo Park (of the University of Pittsburgh) and his co-authors explore opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment. In their JAMA research letter, they compared medication and psychosocial treatments for OUD across the United States, surveying more than 17 000 facilities and analyzing the availability of evidenced-based interventions like buprenorphine and contingency management. “Substance use treatment facilities reported significant gaps in provision of effective treatments for OUD.”

And in the third selection from CNBC, Dr. Scott Gottlieb and Shani Benezra (both of the American Enterprise Institute) describe their experiment: they tasked several large language models with answering questions from the USMLE Step 3. The average resident score is 75%; four of five AI programs surpassed that benchmark. “[These models] may offer a level of precision and consistency that human providers, constrained by fatigue and error, might sometimes struggle to match, and open the way to a future where treatment portals can be powered by machines, rather than doctors.”

There will be no Reading next week.

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Cancer & Suicide & Good News – the New Transl Psychiatry Study; Also, AI & Therapy Dropouts, and Bland on Her Father & His D-Day

June 13, 2024 /

From the Editor

He was so overwhelmed by the cancer diagnosis that he didn’t eat or sleep for days. “It was my worst nightmare.” My patient isn’t alone in that devastating experience, of course – the diagnosis and treatment of cancer is a major life event. Not surprisingly, the suicide rate is roughly double that of the general population in the United States. But with increasing psychosocial interventions, how has this changed over time?

In the first selection, Qiang Liu (of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences) and his co-authors attempt to answer that question in a new paper for Translational Psychiatry. Drawing on 40 years of data and a major US database, they analyzed the journeys of five million cancer patients, discovering good news. “We revealed a gradual increase in cancer-related suicide rates from 1975 to 1989, followed by a gradual decrease from 1989 to 2013, and a marked decrease from 2013 to 2017.” Indeed, between 2013 and 2017, the rate dropped by 27%. We consider the paper and its implications.

In the second selection, Sakiko Yasukawa (of the Sony Corporation) and her co-authors aimed to reduce dropouts from psychotherapy using AI. In a new paper for BMJ Mental Health, they describe an RCT involving 149 people. “The results suggest that the personalised messages sent by the chatbot helped participants control their pace in attending lessons and improve programme adherence without human guidance.”

Last week marked the anniversary of D-Day with ceremonies, including in Normandy. What was the toll on those who returned home? In the third selection, an essay published in The Globe and Mail, Normanne Bland describes her father and his time in Europe. She writes about him with mixed feelings, coloured by his mental health problems, including PTSD. “I had a complicated relationship with my father. I was proud of his service but I loathed his drinking.”

There will be no Reading next week.

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: tDCS for Depression – the New JAMA Psych Paper; Also, Psychiatrists & AI and Dr. Daniel Gorman on Charlatan Syndrome

April 11, 2024 /

From the Editor

In her autobiography, psychiatrist Linda Gask writes about her struggles with depression and the moment she realized that she was better: she started to hear the birds chirping again. For many of our patients, the songs of the birds remain elusive. Antidepressants work but some patients don’t respond, and others are cool to the idea of medication management. CBT is effective but difficult to access. What about Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) – an intervention that could be done at home?

Dr. Lucas Borrione (of the University of São Paulo) and his co-authors try to answer that question in a new JAMA Psychiatry paper. They report on a randomized clinical trial including 210 Brazilian adults with a major depressive episode who were offered tDCS and a digital intervention; the study featured two sham interventions. “The findings indicate that unsupervised home use tDCS should not be currently recommended in clinical practice.” We consider the paper and its clinical implications.

Would tDCS have helped?

Artificial intelligence is having a moment. Not surprisingly, many are seeing the possibilities for mental health care, from better therapy to reduced paperwork. In the second selection, from Psychiatry Research, Charlotte Blease (of Uppsala University) and her co-authors report on the findings of a survey of 138 psychiatrists with both qualitative and quantitative data. “The foremost interest was around the potential of these tools to assist psychiatrists with documentation.”

And in the third selection, Dr. Daniel Gorman (of the University of Toronto) writes about the struggles of taking a child to Disney World in JAMA. Any parent – or aunt or cousin or older sib – can relate. But Dr. Gorman notes the particular challenges that he faces: he’s a child psychiatrist. “Sometimes I fantasize about sharing with parents my doubts about parenting strategies, but the risks always seem too great – the risk of discrediting myself and my profession and the risk of robbing parents of agency and hope.”

DG

Continue reading