Tag: The New York Times

Reading of the Week: Social Media – with Papers from Digital Health & BJP, and Dr. Vivek Murthy on Warning Labels

From the Editor

“I know all about antidepressants,” the young patient told me in the ED. “I’ve seen TikTok videos.” Social media isn’t just a source of great cat videos, many individuals – especially younger patients – turn to it for health information.

But how reliable is the mental-health information? In a new Digital Health paper, Roxanne Turuba (of the University of British Columbia) and her co-authors report on a summative content analysis of the 1 000 most popular mental health TikTok videos. They found that many featured personal stories and confessionals; less than 4% referenced scientific evidence; about a third offering advice was misleading. “Healthcare practitioners and researchers may consider increasing their presence on the platform to promote the dissemination of evidence-based information to a wider and more youth-targeted population.” We examine the paper and its implications.

Social media: more than cat videos?

In the second selection, Harriet Battle (of the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust) and her co-authors consider attitudes toward mental health providers in social media. In a new British Journal of Psychiatry study, they analyzed more than 300 000 tweets spanning over a 16-year period, finding: “positive perceptions of mental health and mental health professionals increased over time. However, ‘psychiatrist’ had a consistently higher proportion of negative perceptions.”

And in the third selection, Dr. Vivek H. Murthy (the former US Surgeon General) writes about social media and adolescents in a New York Times essay. He notes the potential harms of social media for youth. He advocates changes, including warning labels. “We have the expertise, resources and tools to make social media safe for our kids. Now is the time to summon the will to act.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Care & Technology – Papers on Virtual Care and an App for Alcohol; Also, Dr. Reisman on ChatGPT & Bedside Manner

From the Editor

With COVID-19, mental health services were transformed in a matter of weeks when much care shifted to virtual. Today, we are all proficient in our webcams and familiar with terms like Zoom fatigue.

From a system perspective, we have unanswered questions: What’s the right amount of virtual care? When is it appropriate? In the first selection, Matthew Crocker (of the Canadian Institute for Health Information) and his co-authors focus on virtual versus in-person follow-up care after an ED visit in Ontario. Drawing on databases, they analyzed more than 28 000 such visits, wondering if the virtual option led to more adverse psychiatric outcomes. “These results support virtual care as a modality to increase access to follow-up after an acute care psychiatric encounter across a wide range of diagnoses.” We consider the paper and its implications.

Apps for mental health are increasingly popular; the mental health app market may be worth more than $24 billion by 2030, according to one estimate. In the second selection from Internet Interventions, John A. Cunningham (of the University of Toronto) and co-authors describe a new RCT involving participants who were concerned about their drinking. 761 were given either an app with several intervention modules or just educational materials. They were then followed for six months. “The results of this trial provide some supportive evidence that smartphone apps can reduce unhealthy alcohol consumption.”

And in the third selection, Dr. Jonathan Reisman, an ED physician, writes about AI. In a provocative essay for The New York Times, he argues that physicians often rely on scripts to seem compassionate – such as when we deliver bad news. AI, he reasons then, could do that well. “It doesn’t actually matter if doctors feel compassion or empathy toward patients; it only matters if they act like it. In much the same way, it doesn’t matter that A.I. has no idea what we, or it, are even talking about.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: ED Visits & Suicide Attempts – the New AJP Study; Also, Smoking Cessation, and Pappas on Her Genes & Her Olympic Drive

From the Editor

Are ED visits for suicide attempts becoming more frequent? What are the implications for care?

In the first selection from The American Journal of Psychiatry, Dr. Tanner J. Bommersbach (of the Mayo Clinic) and his co-authors attempt to answer these questions by considering US trends in ED visits for suicide attempts and intentional self-harm. Using national survey data collected over a 10-year period, they estimate that the absolute number of suicide attempts tripled to 5.3 million. “A significant national increase in emergency department visits for suicide attempts and intentional self-harm occurred from 2011 to 2020, as a proportion of total emergency department visits and as visits per capita.” We analyze this study.

In the second selection, Drs. Robert A. Kleinman (of the University of Toronto) and Brian S. Barnett (of the Cleveland Clinic) write about smoking cessation and mental illness in a Viewpoint just published in JAMA Psychiatry. They note societal progress – smoking rates are sharply down over the past five decades – yet many with mental illness still use tobacco. They argue that psychiatrists have a significant role to play in addressing this problem. “Patients who stop smoking can limit tobacco-related illness, avoid the distressing effects of nicotine withdrawal and craving, and live longer.”

Later this week, the Olympics conclude in Paris. In the third selection, former Olympian Alexi Pappas discusses her mother’s suicide and her own struggles with depression. In a deeply personal essay from The New York Times, she contemplates genes and destiny and healing. “My future – the universe where my fear lives – was never set in stone, and neither was my mom’s. I’m more than my genes, and I would not reroll the dice if given the option.”

There will be no Readings for the next two weeks.

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: CBT vs Mindfulness for Prolonged Grief Disorder – the New JAMA Psych Study; Also, Wildman on Her Grief, and Clozapine & MedEd

From the Editor

She still wears black. She mourns her partner’s death every day. Despite the passing years, she can’t seem to move forward. DSM-5-TR includes prolonged grief disorder, which has sparked controversy, but it explains well my patient’s complicated bereavement.

What’s evidenced for treatment? Is CBT superior to mindfulness? Richard A. Bryant (of the University of New South Wales) and his co-authors try to address these questions in a new JAMA Psychiatry paper. They describe a randomized clinical trial involving 100 adults offered CBT or mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. “In this study, grief-focused cognitive behavior therapy conferred more benefit for core prolonged grief disorder symptoms and associated problems 6 months after treatment than mindfulness-based cognitive therapy.” We consider the paper and its implications.

In the second selection, Sarah Wildman, a writer and editor, discusses her daughter’s death in an essay for The New York Times. She is candid about her grief. She talks about the passage of time, small things like calendars, and, yes, signs – her daughter promised that if she sees a red fox, it will be her. “I wonder if I should keep every item of clothing I can picture Orli in, I wonder what she would say about each movie I see, each book I read.”

In the third selection, Dr. Theodore R. Zarzar (of the University of North Carolina) emphasizes the importance of clozapine in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. In his JAMA Psychiatry Viewpoint, he argues for incorporating clozapine proficiency into medical education. “Clozapine initiation can be conceptualized as the community psychiatric equivalent of a procedural skill and deserves the mentorship, knowledge acquisition, and practice that learning a procedure entails.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Depression & Lived Experience – the new World Psych Paper; Also, the Life of Dr. John Talbott and Chairs & Patient Satisfaction

From the Editor

“For me, it feels like gravity just starts working on my body harder than it works everywhere else in the world.”

So comments a person with depression about his experience. Typically, we describe depression with a list of symptoms from the DSM-5. But how do patients understand their illness? In a new World Psychiatry paper, Dr. Paolo Fusar-Poli (of King’s College London) and his co-authors attempt to answer that question with a “bottom-up” approach. “To our best knowledge, no [depression] studies have adopted a bottom-up approach (from the lived experience to theory), whereby a global network of experts by experience and academics are mutually engaged in co-writing a joint narrative.” We look at the paper and its implications.

In the second selection, from The New York Times, reporter Trip Gabriel writes an obituary for Dr. John A. Talbott, an American psychiatrist who had championed deinstitutionalization, only to later regret the move away from hospital care. Dr. Talbott once wrote: “The disaster occurred because our mental health delivery system is not a system but a non-system.”

At this time of year, The BMJ runs its light-hearted Christmas issue, featuring much British humour. In the third selection, Ruchita Iyer (of the University of Texas Southwestern) and her co-authors describe a deception trial that increased patient satisfaction without increasing physician time. The “nudge” intervention involved: “Chair placement, defined as positioning the chair within 3 feet (0.9 m) of the bedside and facing the bed.” 

There will be no Readings for the next two weeks. We will return with force (though no British humour) on 11 January 2024.

All the best in the holiday season.

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: An Exercise App for Burnout – the New JAMA Psych Paper; Also, Pandemic Mental Health Use and Szalavitz on Portugal

From the Editor

A recent CMA survey found that more than half of physicians report high levels of burnout; surveys of other health care disciplines show a similar result. Not surprisingly, burnout is much discussed. What can be done for health care workers?

In the first selection, Vincent Gosselin Boucher (of the University of British Columbia) and his co-authors consider that question, offering an app-based intervention featuring exercises that can be done at home. The resulting study, just published in JAMA Psychiatry, included 288 health care workers in an RCT. “[A] 12-week app-based exercise intervention yielded significant reductions in depressive symptoms among HCWs that became more pronounced as time progressed.” We review the paper and its implications.

In the second selection, Jonathan H. Cantor (of the RAND Corporation) and his co-authors look at mental health utilization and spending before and during the pandemic, drawing on almost 1.6 million mental health insurance claims in the US. “[U]tilization and spending rates for mental health care services among commercially insured adults increased by 38.8% and 53.7%, respectively, between 2019 and 2022.” 

Finally, in the third selection, author Maia Szalavitz writes about the decriminalization of low-level drug crimes in Portugal. In a New York Times essay, she argues that critics don’t understand what Portugal accomplished – and, in contrast, how many Americans go untreated in correctional facilities. She concludes: “Shifting priorities and funding to provide high-quality treatment and other supports for recovery like housing takes time. Our failure is a century of criminalization – not much-needed attempts to end it.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: tDCS vs Sham for Depression – the New Lancet Paper; Also, US Ketamine Seizures and Dr. Lamas on Medical Practice & AI

From the Editor

He’s tried several medications, but still struggles with his depression. The story is too familiar. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an option, and increasingly the focus of research. With relatively few side effects and the possibility of doing the treatment at home, the advantages of tDCS are clear.

But how do patients taking antidepressants respond? In the first selection, from the pages of The Lancet, Dr. Gerrit Burkhardt (of the University of Munich) and his co-authors report the findings of an impressive study, with a comparison against sham treatment, across eight sites, and involving triple blinding. “Active tDCS was not superior to sham stimulation during a 6-week period. Our trial does not support the efficacy of tDCS as an additional treatment to SSRIs in adults with MDD.” We consider the paper, an accompanying Comment, and the implications.

In the second selection, Joseph J. Palamar (of New York University) and his colleagues analyze data on US ketamine seizures in a Research Letter for JAMA Psychiatry. They view seizures as a measure of recreational and nonmedical use, and conclude: “These data suggest increasing availability of illicit ketamine.”

And in this week’s third selection, Dr. Daniela J. Lamas (of Harvard University), an internist, writes about AI for The New York Times. In thinking about medical practice, she sees artificial intelligence doing more and more, and ultimately helping with diagnosis. She also sees trade-offs. Still, she concludes: “Beyond saving us time, the intelligence in A.I. – if used well – could make us better at our jobs.”

Note that there will be no Reading next week.

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Lithium Prescribing – the New CJP Paper; Also, AI vs. Doctors (JAMA Int Med) and Bergner on Compulsory Mental Health (NYT)

From the Editor

For patients with bipolar disorder, lithium is an important medication, shown to reduce hospitalizations and suicides better than newer agents. But has it fallen out of fashion? International reports suggest that it has.

In the first selection, Samreen Shafiq (of the University of Calgary) and her co-authors try to answer this question with Canadian data in a new paper for The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. They draw on a decade of Alberta prescription data with more than 580,000 lithium scripts. “This population-based study suggests that the overall number of new and prevalent lithium users is decreasing in Alberta between the years of 2009 and 2018, but the observed pattern suggests that this decrease may have stopped by the end of our study interval.” We consider the paper and its clinical implications.

In the second selection, John W. Ayers (of University of California San Diego) considers AI-generated responses to health care questions posted on social media, like the need to seek medical attention after a minor head injury with a presentation of a lump and a headache. In a JAMA Internal Medicine paper, they compare ChatGPT answers to those of physicians in terms of quality and empathy. “In this cross-sectional study, a chatbot generated quality and empathetic responses to patient questions posed in an online forum.”

The debate over coercive care is hot, with proposals to rebalance patients’ rights actively discussed in New York City, Alberta, and California. In the third selection, author Daniel Bergner writes that we should look for alternatives to medications. In a New York Times essay, he argues that antipsychotics are problematic. “By doubling down on existing methods, we’re only beckoning more failure.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Bipolar & Med Adherence – the New Journal of Affective Disorders Study; Also, Sleep (QT) and Sheff on Involuntary Treatment (NYT)

From the Editor

You wrote a prescription, but did he actually take the medications? For those with bipolar disorder, pharmacotherapy is an essential part of care. Studies have noted poor adherence. 

To date, though, there hasn’t been a big cohort study. And there are good questions to ask: what drugs are more linked with adherence? Who is more likely not to take the medications? In a new paper just published in the Journal of Affective Disorders, Dr. Jonne Lintunen (of the University of Eastern Finland) and his co-authors attempt to answer these questions. They draw on Finnish data, covering more than three decades and including over 33 000 patients. “The majority of patients with bipolar disorder do not use their medications as prescribed.” We consider the paper and its clinical implications.

In the second selection, Dr. Michael Mak (of the University of Toronto) comments on sleep in a new Quick Takes podcast interview. In this sleep “update,” we talk about meds, CBT, and the mobile apps that he recommends to patients and their families. We also explore the history of sleep medicine and mull the growing role apps and wearables are playing in both diagnosis and therapy. “The lines between sleep, health, and mental health in general are blurred.”

In the third selection, author David Sheff talks about his son’s addiction and recovery – and involuntary treatment. In a New York Times’ essay, he notes the challenges of engaging those with substance problems. He sees several ways forward, including involuntary treatment. “Many people in the traditional recovery world believe that we must wait for people who are addicted to hit bottom, with the hope that they’ll choose to enter treatment. It’s an archaic and dangerous theory.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: rTMS – the New JAMA Psych Paper; Also, Opioid Overdoses (JAMA Net Open) and Green on Peak Mental Health (NYT)

From the Editor

She’s an accomplished person who had succeeded in business and then writing, all the while raising three children; she also has an amazing smile and lights up the room when talking about her kids. But in my office, sick with depression, she can only focus on her losses and failings; the smile is absent.

Depression is common and disabling. Those who are affected in late-life are particularly challenging to treat. Is there a better way? In the first selection from JAMA Psychiatry, Dr. Daniel Blumberger (of the University of Toronto) and his co-authors consider theta burst stimulation, a newer form of rTMS which has shown promise in earlier work. Their study is a randomized noninferiority trial, directly comparing the two versions of rTMS in elderly patients with depression. The result? “We showed that bilateral TBS was noninferior to standard bilateral rTMS in improving depression, and similarly well tolerated, in a real-world sample of older adults with TRD [treatment resistant depression]…” We review the paper and its clinical implications.

In the second selection, Lori Ann Post (of Northwestern University) and her co-authors draw on CDC data to look at opioid overdoses in the United States with a focus on geography. In a JAMA Network Open research letter, they find: “Overall, opioid-involved overdose deaths rates increased steadily in counties of every urbanicity type, although there were distinct temporal wave patterns by urbanicity.”

And in the third selection, Huw Green (of the University of Cambridge) wonders about mental health and mental illness – and worries that the terms are becoming blurred together. Writing in The New York Times, the psychologist concludes: “When we move away from a focus on psychological problems and toward ‘mental health’ more broadly, clinicians stumble into terrain that extends beyond our expertise. We ought to be appropriately humble.”  

This month, the Reading of the Week enters its ninth year. A quick word of thanks for your ongoing interest.

DG



Continue reading