From the Editor
Her housing is unstable; major relationships have ended; she is deeply in debt. She presented to the emergency department hoping for help with her crystal methamphetamine addiction. “That drug just grabs you and holds you.” No medications have demonstrated efficacy for stimulant use disorder. But could contingency management be part of a meaningful plan for her recovery?
In the first selection, a paper published last month in The American Journal of Psychiatry, Lara N. Coughlin (of the University of Michigan) and her co-authors attempt to answer that question. They did a retrospective cohort study, comparing those who received contingency management with those who didn’t, looking at outcomes and 12 months of data, and involving 1 481 patients and an equal number of people in the control group. “This study provides the first evidence that contingency management use in real-world health care settings is associated with reduced risk of mortality among patients with stimulant use disorder.” We consider the paper and its implications.
In the second selection, Tony Rousmaniere (of Sentio University) and his co-authors examine large language models as health providers. In a timely paper for The Lancet Psychiatry, they weigh the regulatory and legal contexts. “LLMs have entered everyday use for mental health. Developers who embrace transparency and collaborative research can transform the mental health landscape and define the future of digital care for the better.”
And in the third selection, Emily A. Kumpf (of Johns Hopkins University) writes personally about her first-episode psychosis in Psychiatric Services. While she is grateful for the care she received in the emergency room, she was traumatized by the experience. “When I was restrained, every part of me genuinely believed the medications they were injecting into me were chemicals intended to kill me. My scream pierced through the hospital walls; I thought I was dying. To my surprise, I woke up the next morning.”
DG
Recent Comments