Tag: Academic Psychiatry

Reading of the Week: Preventing Mental Disorders After Disasters – the New BMJ Ment Health Paper; Also, Healthy Device Use and Dr. Qayyum on Regret

From the Editor

Floods. Hurricanes. Fire. Extreme weather seems to be more common these days – resulting in some experiencing PTSD and other mental disorders. In an age of climate change, what can mental health services offer? Is it possible to prevent major mental illness with interventions like CBT?

Ahlke Kip (of the University of Münster) and her co-authors attempt to answer these questions in a new meta-analysis and systematic review which assesses the efficacy of psychological and psychosocial interventions after exposure to natural hazards. In the BMJ Mental Health paper, they looked at 10 RCT studies involving more than 5 000 participants, including both civilians and disaster responders, focusing on symptoms of PTSD, depression, and anxiety. They didn’t find superiority to passive control conditions. “The current evidence does not allow for any recommendations regarding prevention programmes in the aftermath of natural hazards.” We consider the paper and its implications.

In the second selection, Joseph Firth (of the University of Manchester) and his co-authors weigh in on youth and digital device usage. In a paper for World Psychiatry, they sought “directly actionable advice” for parents and youth and then drew on the literature to create tips for teenagers. “We sought to produce a set of best-practice approaches, on the basis of available evidence and guidelines, for adolescents and their parents looking to improve their device usage patterns.”

And in this week’s third selection, Dr. Zheala Qayyum (of Harvard University) writes about guilt and time in a paper for Academic Psychiatry. The child and adolescent psychiatrist describes an unkind act in her youth – and an opportunity to make amends decades later. She also notes the tie to training and education. “Only by sharing and reflecting on our own moments, successes, failures, and vulnerabilities, can our trainees recognize and respond to such instances in their own experience.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Psychiatric Care in 21 Countries – The JAMA Psych Study; Also, Industry Payments to Psychiatrists and Batterman on Relating

From the Editor

Our patients often struggle to access care. But what is the global experience? What percentage of patients in other countries receive care that meets basic standards?

In the first selection, Dr. Daniel V. Vigo (of the University of British Columbia) and his co-authors attempt to answer these questions in a new paper for JAMA Psychiatry. They analyzed effective treatment and its key components for nine mental disorders drawing on the World Mental Health surveys which included structured interviews. Vigo et al. cover familiar ground, but the study stands out due to its unusually robust dataset which includes almost 57 000 people in 21 countries. “The proportion of 12-month person-disorders receiving effective treatment was 6.9%.” We consider the paper and its implications.

In the second selection, Dr. John L. Havlik (of Stanford University) and his co-authors weigh in on industry payment to US psychiatrists. In this Psychiatric Services paper, they analyzed six years of data covering nearly 60 000 physicians, drawing on government databases, finding: “a small number of psychiatrists (<600 psychiatrists per year) received approximately 75% of industry’s compensation to psychiatrists each year.”

And, in the third selection, medical student Alexander I. Batterman (of Rowan University) writes about a patient encounter for Academic Psychiatry. He notes the challenges of connecting with a patient who has psychosis and is dismissive. Batterman persists – and understands. “As a former epilepsy patient who is intimately aware of what it is like to be questioned and observed by clinicians and students in the emergency department, as if I were an animal at the zoo on display, I could relate to the human experience of being judged.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Physician Burnout – the New NEJM Review; Also, Depression in India and Dr. Ushna Shamoon on Bias

From the Editor

I started watching the clock, thinking about how much time is left in my day. That just started getting earlier and earlier. One day, at 8:35 am, I thought: Oh boy, it feels like I’ve been here a while already.

So comments a colleague on his burnout. 

More and more, we are discussing physician burnout. But how has the concept of burnout evolved over time? How is it distinct from depression? What are evidence-based interventions? Drs. Constance Guille (of the University of South Carolina) and Srijan Sen (of the University of Michigan) seek to answer these questions in a new review for The New England Journal of Medicine. Though they note challenges, including with the definition itself, they strike an optimistic tone. “Over the past 15 years, progress has been made in raising awareness about physician well-being and improving well-being in specific populations, including physicians in training. There is a clear pathway for investing in and implementing established interventions and developing new interventions to improve well-being for all physicians.” We consider the review and its implications.

In the second selection, Dr. Felix Teufel (of Emory University) and his co-authors explore the treatment of depression in India. In a new JAMA Psychiatry brief report, they drew on a national survey, finding limited care, particularly among those living in rural areas. “Nationwide, 97% of individuals with depression were undiagnosed, and around half of individuals with diagnosed depression were untreated.”

And, in the third selection from Academic Psychiatry, Dr. Ushna Shamoon (of the University of Texas) writes about her medical school rotation in a county jail. She discusses her biases before stepping into the correctional facility. She then describes her connection to an inmate suffering from mental illness. “Though her mind was riddled with psychosis, she was not just a victim of her illness.”

Note: there will be no Reading next week.

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Fatal Overdoses & Drug Decriminalization – the new JAMA Psych Paper; Also, ChatGPT vs Residents, and Chang on Good Psychiatry

From the Editor

Does decriminalizing the possession of small amounts of street drugs reduce overdoses? Proponents argue yes because those who use substances can seek care – including in emergency situations – without fear of police involvement and charges. Opponents counter that decriminalization means fewer penalties for drug use, resulting in more misuse and thus more overdoses. The debate can be shrill – but lacking in data.

Spruha Joshi (of New York University) and co-authors bring numbers to the policy discussion with a new JAMA Psychiatry paper. They analyze the impact of decriminalization in two states, Oregon and Washington, contrasting overdoses there and in other US states that didn’t decriminalize. “This study found no evidence of an association between legal changes that removed or substantially reduced criminal penalties for drug possession in Oregon and Washington and fatal drug overdose rates.” We consider the paper and its implications.

In the second selection, Dr. Ashwin Nayak (of Stanford University) and his co-authors look at AI for the writing of patient histories. In a new research letter for JAMA Internal Medicine, they do a head-to-head (head-to-CPU?) comparison with ChatGPT and residents both writing patient histories (specifically, the history of present illness, or HPI). “HPIs generated by a chatbot or written by senior internal medicine residents were graded similarly by internal medicine attending physicians.”

And in the third selection, medical student Howard A. Chang (of Johns Hopkins University) wonders about “good” psychiatry in a paper for Academic Psychiatry. He reflects on the comments of surgeons, pediatricians, and obstetricians, and then mulls the role of our specialty. “I have gleaned that a good psychiatrist fundamentally sees and cares about patients with mental illness as dignified human beings, not broken brains. The good psychiatrist knows and treats the person in order to treat the disease.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Smoking Cessation – Doing Bad, Feeling Good? Also, Ethnicity & Opioids (JAMA Psych) and Dr. Freedman on Lunches (Acad Psych)

From the Editor

We ask our patients about cannabis. We inquire about illicit drugs. But are we forgetting tobacco? A new paper in Psychiatric Services helps answer that question – and, perhaps, raises other questions, including about how we could do better. 

In the first selection, Sarah A. White (of Johns Hopkins University) and her co-authors draw on American data to look at smoking cessation medications in a new Psychiatric Services paper. Among more than 55,000 smokers (many of whom have mental illness), they find that: “Cessation pharmacotherapy for smokers remained vastly underprescribed across all groups. At least 83% of smokers with or without mental illness did not receive varenicline, NRT, or bupropion during the 14-year study period.” We consider the paper and its clinical implications.

In the second selection, Huiru Dong (of Harvard University) and her co-authors look at buprenorphine treatment and demographics in the United States. Their JAMA Psychiatry research letter, which was just published, finds a growing gap. “The observed heterogeneity in buprenorphine treatment duration among racial and ethnic groups may reflect disproportionate structural barriers in treatment retention for Opioid Use Disorder.”

In the third selection, Dr. David Freedman (of the University of Toronto) writes about resident lunches for Academic Psychiatry. Dr. Freedman, who is a resident, notes that in-person lunches shifted to virtual ones for more than two years because of the pandemic – something that was necessary but unfortunate. He argues that the gatherings are important. “Yet, as a collective of residents munch on the last bites of their sandwiches, say goodbye, and return to work, I am struck by the camaraderie. Funded resident lunches nurture the professional identities of psychiatry trainees – an essential element of medical education.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Mindfulness for Anxiety? The New JAMA Psychiatry Paper; Also, Sim in Med Ed (QT) and Dr. Sen on Burnout & Depression (NEJM)

From the Editor

Mindfulness is trendy. It’s offered at your local YMCA. There are mindfulness techniques in popular apps. Corporations offer sessions over the lunch hour.

But is it helpful? Millions of North Americans struggle with anxiety disorders. Could mindfulness help them? Is it an alternative for those who don’t want to take medications? In the first selection, Dr. Elizabeth A. Hoge (of Georgetown University) and her co-authors try to answer these questions. Their results have just been published in JAMA Psychiatry. In an RCT, they compare a form of mindfulness to the use of an SSRI. They write: “Our prospective randomized clinical trial found that MBSR was noninferior to escitalopram for the treatment of anxiety disorders.” We consider the paper and its clinical implications.

In this week’s second selection, we look at a new Quick Takes podcast interview with CAMH’s Stephanie Sliekers and Dr. Petal Abdool (of the University of Toronto). They discuss simulation in mental health education, noting the potential. They also talk about their innovative work in this area. “We can create an environment that’s safe, predictable, consistent, standardized, and reproducible.”

In this week’s third selection, Dr. Srijan Sen (of the University of Michigan) writes about physician burnout. In a Perspective paper published in The New England Journal of Medicine, he argues that separating burnout from depression is problematic. He writes: “Expanding reform efforts to encompass depression and mental health more broadly will not reduce the urgency of reforming our health care system. Rather, it will increase the likelihood that physicians who are struggling can access the spectrum of available evidence-based individual interventions.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Are Involuntary Admissions on the Rise? The New CJP Paper; Also, Telepsychiatry (JAMA Psych) and Dr. Oh on Suicide (Acad Psych)

From the Editor

A recent New York Times article notes that adolescents are increasingly looking for information on mental health and turning to TikTok. Such is life at a time when stigma fades: people are curious, though not necessarily going to the best places for information.

But are we reaching people earlier in their illness experience? We hope that the answer is yes – a new paper with British Columbian data, however, suggests that police apprehensions are more common, as are involuntary admissions, indicating that more people are in crisis. In the first selection from The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Jackson P. Loyal (of Simon Fraser University) and his co-authors draw on administrative databases and find a major shift: “While roughly half of the people hospitalized for mental health and substance use disorders were admitted voluntarily in 2008/2009, by 2017/2018 this fell to approximately one-third.” We look at the paper and its clinical implications.

British Columbia: a province of rivers, whales, and involuntary admissions

In the second selection, Dr. Carlos Blanco (of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, United States) and his co-authors consider the rise of telepsychiatry, noting that 39% of mental health care in the US is now virtual. In this new JAMA Psychiatry Viewpoint, “Expansion of telepsychiatry creates new opportunities to increase treatment access, while it poses overlapping challenges to multiple stakeholders…”

And in the third selection, Dr. Nicholas Zhenwei Oh (of the Ministry of Health Holdings, Singapore) writes personally and thoughtfully about the loss of a patient by suicide. He goes into detail on his own experience during training. “Patient suicide is possibly the great equaliser amongst psychiatrists, psychiatry trainees, and perhaps any other clinician who has experienced a patient’s suicide. My own experience came suddenly and unexpectedly, and it will likely leave a psychological scar as a grim reminder of one of the lowest points of my career.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: ECT & Suicide – the New Lancet Psych Paper; Also, Violence & Psych Trainees (Acad Psych) and Dr. Murthy on Burnout (NEJM)

From the Editor

In a recent survey, 20% identified fear of death as a major concern with ECT. One of the oldest treatments in psychiatry is also its most stigmatized and feared.

And is it also underappreciated? Is ECT a lifesaver for those who are suicidal? In the first selection, Dr. Tyler S. Kaster (of the University of Toronto) and his co-authors attempt to answer that question with a propensity score-weighted, retrospective cohort study comparing those who received ECT and those who didn’t, using Ontario data. In The Lancet Psychiatry, they write: “1 year after discharge from a psychiatric hospital, patients with depression who were exposed to electroconvulsive therapy had a nearly 50% reduction in the relative risk of death by suicide when compared with those who had not been exposed.” We consider the paper and its clinical implications.

We aren’t talking about candy

In the second selection, Dr. Victor Pereira-Sanchez (of the New York University) and his co-authors look at violence against European psychiatric trainees. In this Academic Psychiatry paper, drawing on survey data, they conclude: “Violence from patients is reported by many psychiatric trainees across countries in Europe, with very frequent verbal abuse and worrisome figures of physical and sexual assaults.”

Finally, in the third selection, Dr. Vivek H. Murthy (the US Surgeon General) writes about burnout and American health care workers. In The New England Journal of Medicine, he offers a practical plan, with an emphasis on reducing administrative burden, bettering mental health for health care workers, and changing culture to support well-being. He argues that action is needed: “we cannot allow ourselves to fail health workers and the communities they serve.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Online DBT – the New JAMA Paper; Also, Prediabetes and Preaddiction, and Greenberg on the Delusional Ones (Acad Psych)

From the Editor

He cut himself out of frustration with a break-up. She came to the ED with suicidal thoughts after losing her job.

Some patients need help with ongoing self-harm and suicidal thoughts – but access to care is challenging, particularly for dialectal behavioural therapy. Could a simple intervention help? Could it be delivered virtually?

In the first selection, Dr. Gregory E. Simon (of Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute) and his co-authors detail a pragmatic randomized trial that evaluated two low-intensity outreach programs, aiming to reduce risk of self-harm and suicidal behaviour. In this new JAMA study, they conclude: “Compared with usual care, offering care management did not significantly reduce the risk of self-harm, and offering brief online dialectical behavior therapy skills training increased the risk of self-harm among at-risk adults.” We look at the study.

In the second selection, Thomas McLellan (of the University of Pennsylvania) and his co-authors note the failings of substance treatment and then mull a way forward: considering the approach to diabetic care and the concept of prediabetes. Should we embrace preaddiction? They write: “the diabetes example shows that an early intervention approach can work given a comprehensive, sustained effort.”

And in the third selection, Dr. Norman R. Greenberg (of Yale University) contemplates his patient’s psychosis and his approach. Drawing on an old Hasidic tale, this resident of psychiatry stops debating with his patient; he chooses to listen to him instead. He writes: “I may not always be able to convince others of my perspective, I hope that I am able to convince others that we share similar goals and that I care about them.”

DG


Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Better with Time? The New JAMA Paper on Stigma; Also, Dr. Steuber on Real Doctors – and Real Stigma (Academic Psych)

From the Editor

“To say that I didn’t know my great-uncle, Wolfe Levine, would understate things. I didn’t even know of such an uncle, brother of my mother’s father (a grandfather with whom I was close). In retrospect, it’s clear that my great-uncle was simply unmentionable.” In a long essay, writer Howard Husock notes that his great uncle, who suffered from mental illness, was never mentioned.

Society’s view of mental illness has changed much in recent years (good), but some stigma still exists (not so good). How have the public’s views shifted over time?

In our first selection, drawing from JAMA Network Open, we look at a new paper by Bernice A. Pescosolido (of Indiana University) and her co-authors. Reviewing attitudes and beliefs over 22 years, they find that: “this survey study found the first evidence of significant decreases in public stigma toward depression.” That said, not all the results are encouraging. We look at the paper and its clinical implications.

In the second selection, Dr. Elizabeth R. Steuber (of Johns Hopkins University) writes about the stigma faced by those in mental health care. Dr. Steuber, who is a resident of psychiatry, discusses the comments of a patient. She contemplates her work and the potential to change ongoing stigma: “I am hopeful that by leading through example on the medical floors, psychiatry trainees will continue to reshape how the field is seen by society at-large, even if it is only one patient at a time.”

DG

Continue reading