Month: September 2026

Reading of the Week: Will the Doctor See You Now? Video vs In-Person Visit Outcomes; Also, Suicide Prevention in India and Barford on Fake Patients

September 24, 2026 / / 0 Comments

From the Editor

This month, Reading of the Week celebrates its 12th anniversary. Over these past years, the program has grown, establishing partnerships in seven countries and promotional arrangements in three more.  

A quick word of thanks for your ongoing interest.

In March 2020, mental health services were transformed by the reality of the pandemic and the webcam became indispensable. Today, many clinical programs offer a mix of video, in-person, and phone visits. But what are the outcomes?

In a new JAMA Network Open paper, Samantha L. Connolly (of Harvard University) and her co-authors attempt to answer that question. Using Veterans Affairs’ data involving 813 699 participants, they compared different modalities of care and looked at outcomes over a year, including inpatient admissions. “In this comparative effectiveness study, receiving mental healthcare via video was associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with receiving care via phone or in-person.” We consider the paper and its implications.

In the second selection, Rakhi Dandona (of the Public Health Foundation of India) and Dr. Rajesh Sagar (of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences) write about suicide prevention in JAMA Psychiatry. They offer lessons from India, where one in five suicides occur. “If most suicides occur in LMICs, then the future of suicide prevention should increasingly be shaped by evidence generated within them.”

And in the third selection from The Globe and Mail, Pat Barford writes about being a “fake patient,” to use her term. She describes her work as a standardized patient for medical students. “I get to watch the highest level of learning happen in real-time.” 

DG


Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Economic Burden of Depression – the New Nature Med Study; Also, AI & Delusions and Dr. Garfinkle-Crowell on Young Women

September 17, 2026 / / 0 Comments

From the Editor

This month, Reading of the Week celebrates its 12th anniversary. Over these past years, the program has grown, with partnerships in seven countries and promotion in three more.  

A quick word of thanks for your ongoing interest.

We usually think about depression on the individual level – our patients tell stories of lost jobs, broken relationships, and personal tragedies. But what are the societal costs? In a new Nature Medicine paper, Zhong Cao (of Heidelberg University) and his co-authors attempt to answer that question. They analyzed World Bank data; using labour force participation, education, and work experience, they projected the global economic burden of depression to 2050. “Overall, depression places a heavy strain on the global economy, accounting for about 0.460% of the world’s annual GDP. This burden, however, is uneven across regions.” We consider the paper and its implications.

In the second selection, from JAMA Psychiatry, Philip R. Corlett (of Yale University) weighs in on AI and psychosis in a new commentary. Does AI cause psychosis? Does it exacerbate problems for those who are vulnerable? Corlett reviews this young literature and offers his thoughts. “I suspect that they are not merely old wine in new bottles, but rather new wine in new bottles.”

Finally, in the third selection, Dr. Suzanne Garfinkle-Crowell (of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai) writes about therapy-speak and young women for The New York Times. She describes the trend and its implications – and warns against dismissing it. “Ideally, we should create an environment in which girls can stop blaming their own brains for every problem and where they don’t feel they have to be sick to be heard.”

DG

Continue reading

Reading of the Week: Psychosocial Care After War – The New Lancet Psych Paper; Also, AI vs Physicians (JAMA) and the Latest in the News

September 10, 2026 /

From the Editor

He survived the civil war. But nightmares haunted him and he rarely left his apartment. My patient had survived, yes, but his mental health problems, untreated in his home country, tormented him. In a world of war and violence, my patient’s experiences – the mental illness and the lack of care – are all too common. 

With few psychiatrists and psychologists, could non-specialist providers help fill the treatment gap? Anushka R. Patel (of Harvard University) and her co-authors attempt to answer that question in an impressive new systematic review and meta-analysis published in Lancet Psychiatry. Drawing on a quarter century of studies and involving more than 10 000 survivors, they compared non-specialist care with a relatively inactive control. “Our findings support the overall effectiveness of non-specialist provider-delivered psychosocial interventions for violence survivors…” We consider the paper and its implications.

In the second selection, from JAMA, Dr. Ezekiel J. Emanuel and his co-authors write thoughtfully if controversially about artificial intelligence. While many assume that medicine will be reshaped by the collaboration of physicians and computers, they suggest otherwise, focusing on five cognitive medical tasks. “That in the near future AI alone may provide better patient care than physicians or physician-controlled hybrids at 5 fundamental cognitive medical tasks is unsettling but seems probable.”

Finally, we review the latest news with articles from The Toronto Star, The Wall Street Journal, and The Globe and Mail. The topics: addiction treatment, the bias of therapists, and the PTSD and research of Margaret McKinnon.

DG

Continue reading