From the Editor
He survived the civil war. But nightmares haunted him and he rarely left his apartment. My patient had survived, yes, but his mental health problems, untreated in his home country, tormented him. In a world of war and violence, my patient’s experiences – the mental illness and the lack of care – are all too common.
With few psychiatrists and psychologists, could non-specialist providers help fill the treatment gap? Anushka R. Patel (of Harvard University) and her co-authors attempt to answer that question in an impressive new systematic review and meta-analysis published in Lancet Psychiatry. Drawing on a quarter century of studies and involving more than 10 000 survivors, they compared non-specialist care with a relatively inactive control. “Our findings support the overall effectiveness of non-specialist provider-delivered psychosocial interventions for violence survivors…” We consider the paper and its implications.
In the second selection, from JAMA, Dr. Ezekiel J. Emanuel and his co-authors write thoughtfully if controversially about artificial intelligence. While many assume that medicine will be reshaped by the collaboration of physicians and computers, they suggest otherwise, focusing on five cognitive medical tasks. “That in the near future AI alone may provide better patient care than physicians or physician-controlled hybrids at 5 fundamental cognitive medical tasks is unsettling but seems probable.”
Finally, we review the latest news with articles from The Toronto Star, The Wall Street Journal, and The Globe and Mail. The topics: addiction treatment, the bias of therapists, and the PTSD and research of Margaret McKinnon.
DG
Recent Comments